Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Daniel Casado Herraez

dblp:383/1244 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0001-5387-2545ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-author · 3 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 3 · 2 first-author · 3 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Robot navigation and mapping · 46% Autonomous driving · 29% 3D vision · 25%

Topics — the 10 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Autonomous driving
perception
2.432025
Ground-Aware Automotive Radar Odometry · ICRA 2025
Radar Tracker: Moving Instance Tracking in Sparse and Noisy Radar Point Clouds · ICRA 2024
Radar-Only Odometry and Mapping for Autonomous Vehicles · ICRA 2024
Computer vision › 3D vision › motion estimation
ego-motion estimation
0.912025
Ground-Aware Automotive Radar Odometry · ICRA 2025
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
localization
0.912025
Ground-Aware Automotive Radar Odometry · ICRA 2025
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › localization
odometry
0.912025
Ground-Aware Automotive Radar Odometry · ICRA 2025
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
odometry and mapping
0.812024
Radar-Only Odometry and Mapping for Autonomous Vehicles · ICRA 2024
Computer vision › 3D vision › point cloud processing
radar point cloud processing
0.812024
Radar Tracker: Moving Instance Tracking in Sparse and Noisy Radar Point Clouds · ICRA 2024
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › localization › odometry
radar odometry
0.312025
Ground-Aware Automotive Radar Odometry · ICRA 2025
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
sensor fusion
0.312025
Ground-Aware Automotive Radar Odometry · ICRA 2025
Computer vision › 3D vision › point cloud registration
iterative closest point
0.212024
Radar-Only Odometry and Mapping for Autonomous Vehicles · ICRA 2024
Computer vision › 3D vision
point cloud registration
0.212024
Radar-Only Odometry and Mapping for Autonomous Vehicles · ICRA 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

ground plane extraction · 0.9factor graph optimization · 0.9point-to-point ICP · 0.8doppler velocity · 0.8deep learning · 0.8constant velocity filter · 0.8attention mechanism · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Ground-Aware Automotive Radar Odometry
abstract
Odometry is crucial for the navigation of autonomous vehicles in unknown environments. While cameras and LiDARs are commonly used to estimate the ego-motion of a vehicle, these sensors face limitations under bad lighting and severe weather conditions. Automotive radars overcome these challenges, but radar point clouds are generally sparse and noisy, making it difficult to identify useful features within a radar scan. In this paper, we address the problem of ego-motion estimation using a single automotive radar sensor. We propose a simple, yet effective, heuristic-based method to extract the ground plane from single radar scans and perform ground plane matching between consecutive scans. Additionally, we perform a windowed factor-graph optimization of the poses together with the ground plane, improving the accuracy of the pose estimation. We put our work to the test using the 4DRadarDataset. Our findings illustrate the state-of-the-art performance of our odometry approach compared to existing alternatives that use radar point clouds.
Daniel Casado Herraez, Franz Kaschner, Matthias Zeller, Dominik Muhle, Jens Behley, Michael Heidingsfeld, Daniel Cremers, Cyrill Stachniss
ICRA1
2024 Radar-Only Odometry and Mapping for Autonomous Vehicles
abstract
Odometry and mapping play a pivotal role in the navigation of autonomous vehicles. In this paper, we address the problem of pose estimation and map creation using only radar sensors. We focus on two odometry estimation approaches followed by a mapping step. The first one is a new point-to-point ICP approach that leverages the velocity information provided by 3D radar sensors. The second one is advantageous for 2D radars with a low number of samples, and particularly useful for scenarios where the sensor is being blocked by large dynamic obstacles. It exploits a constant velocity filter and the measured Doppler velocities to estimate the vehicle’s ego-motion. We enrich this with a filtering step to improve the accuracy of the points in the resulting map. We put our work to the test using the View of Delft and NuScenes datasets, which involve 3D and 2D radar sensors. Our findings illustrate state-of-the-art performance of our odometry techniques in terms of accuracy when compared to existing alternatives. Moreover, we demonstrate that our map filtering methodology achieves higher similarity rates than the raw unfiltered map when benchmarked against a corresponding LiDAR map.
Daniel Casado Herraez, Matthias Zeller, Ignacio Vizzo, Michael Heidingsfeld, Cyrill Stachniss
ICRA1
2024 Radar Tracker: Moving Instance Tracking in Sparse and Noisy Radar Point Clouds
abstract
Robots and autonomous vehicles should be aware of what happens in their surroundings. The segmentation and tracking of moving objects are essential for reliable path planning, including collision avoidance. We investigate this estimation task for vehicles using radar sensing. We address moving instance tracking in sparse radar point clouds to enhance scene interpretation. We propose a learning-based radar tracker incorporating temporal offset predictions to enable direct center-based association and enhance segmentation performance by including additional motion cues. We implement attention-based tracking for sparse radar scans to include appearance features and enhance performance. The final association combines geometric and appearance features to overcome the limitations of center-based tracking to associate instances reliably. Our approach shows an improved performance on the moving instance tracking benchmark of the RadarScenes dataset compared to the current state of the art.
Matthias Zeller, Daniel Casado Herraez, Jens Behley, Michael Heidingsfeld, Cyrill Stachniss
ICRA2