Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Prathik Vijaykumar
dblp:383/3720
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 100% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Cloud and datacenter computing · 50% Performance modeling and evaluation · 50% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Mathematical optimization › online optimization
online convex optimization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | CONGO: Compressive Online Gradient Optimization · ICLR 2025 |
Mathematical optimization
stochastic optimization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | CONGO: Compressive Online Gradient Optimization · ICLR 2025 |
Mathematical optimization › black-box optimization
zeroth-order optimization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | CONGO: Compressive Online Gradient Optimization · ICLR 2025 |
Cloud and datacenter computing
microservices |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | CONGO: Compressive Online Gradient Optimization · ICLR 2025 |
Performance modeling and evaluation › queueing models
queueing network model |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | CONGO: Compressive Online Gradient Optimization · ICLR 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
regret analysis · 1.7compressive sensing · 1.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | CONGO: Compressive Online Gradient OptimizationabstractWe address the challenge of zeroth-order online convex optimization where the objective function's gradient exhibits sparsity, indicating that only a small number of dimensions possess non-zero gradients. Our aim is to leverage this sparsity to obtain useful estimates of the objective function's gradient even when the only information available is a limited number of function samples. Our motivation stems from the optimization of large-scale queueing networks that process time-sensitive jobs. Here, a job must be processed by potentially many queues in sequence to produce an output, and the service time at any queue is a function of the resources allocated to that queue. Since resources are costly, the end-to-end latency for jobs must be balanced with the overall cost of the resources used. While the number of queues is substantial, the latency function primarily reacts to resource changes in only a few, rendering the gradient sparse. We tackle this problem by introducing the Compressive Online Gradient Optimization framework which allows compressive sensing methods previously applied to stochastic optimization to achieve regret bounds with an optimal dependence on the time horizon without the full problem dimension appearing in the bound. For specific algorithms, we reduce the samples required per gradient estimate to scale with the gradient's sparsity factor rather than its full dimensionality. Numerical simulations and real-world microservices benchmarks demonstrate CONGO's superiority over gradient descent approaches that do not account for sparsity. Jeremy Carleton, Prathik Vijaykumar, Divyanshu Saxena, Dheeraj Narasimha, Srinivas Shakkottai, Aditya Akella |
ICLR | 2 |