EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Alex Lopes
dblp:383/4046
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Cloud and datacenter computing · 50% Storage systems · 38% Interconnection networks and networks-on-chip · 12% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Storage systems › flash and SSD
solid-state drive |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | The Case For Data Centre Hyperloops · ISCA 2024 |
Cloud and datacenter computing
datacenter network |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | The Case For Data Centre Hyperloops · ISCA 2024 |
Interconnection networks and networks-on-chip
network bandwidth |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | The Case For Data Centre Hyperloops · ISCA 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
simulation · 0.8modeling · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | The Case For Data Centre HyperloopsabstractData movement is a hot-button topic today, with workloads like machine learning (ML) training, graph processing, and data analytics consuming datasets as large as 30PB. Such a dataset would take almost a week to transfer at 400 gbps while consuming megajoules of energy just to operate the two endpoints’ optical transceivers. All of this time and energy is seen as an unavoidable overhead on top of directly accessing the disks that store the data. In this paper, we re-evaluate the fundamental assumption of networked data copying and instead propose the adoption of embodied data movement. Our insight is that solid state disks (SSDs) have been rapidly growing in an under-exploited way: their data density, both in TB per unit volume and unit mass. With data centres reaching kilometres in length, we propose a new architecture featuring data centre hyperloops2(DHLs) where large datasets, stored on commodity SSDs, are moved via magnetic levitation in low-pressure tubes. By eliminating much of the potential friction inherent to embodied data movement, DHLs offer more efficient data movement, with SSDs potentially travelling at hundreds of metres per second. Consequently, a contemporary dataset can be moved through a DHL in seconds and then accessed with local latency and bandwidth well into the terabytes per second. DHLs have the potential to massively reduce the network bandwidth and energy consumption associated with moving large datasets, but raise a variety of questions regarding the viability of their realisation and deployment. Through flexibility and creative engineering, we argue that many potential issues can be resolved. Further, we present models of DHLs and their application to workloads with growing data movement demands, such as training machine learning algorithms, large-scale physics experiments, and data centre backups. For a fixed data movement task, we obtain energy reductions of $1.6 \times$ to $376.1 \times$ and time speedups from $114.8 \times$ to $646.4 \times$ versus 400gbps optical networking. When modelling DHL in simulation, we obtain time speedups of between $5.7 \times$ and $118 \times$ (iso-power) and communication power reductions of between $6.4 \times$ and $135 \times$ (iso-time) to train an iteration of a representative DLRM workload. We provide a cost analysis, showing that DHLs are financially practical. With the scale of the improvements realisable through DHLs, we consider this paper a call to action for our community to grapple with the remaining architectural challenges.2HyperLoopTMis a term for high-speed transportation using magnetic levitation trains and low-pressure tubes; it does not imply a loop topology. Guillem López-Paradís, Isaac M. Hair, Sid Kannan, Roman Rabbat, Parker Murray, Alex Lopes, Rory Zahedi, Winston Zuo, Jonathan Balkind |
ISCA | 6 |