Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Adrian Hartmann
dblp:383/4382
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Legged, aerial and field robots · 50% Motion planning and robot control · 50% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control
compliant motion control |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Deep Compliant Control for Legged Robots · ICRA 2024 |
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots › legged robots
legged robot locomotion |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Deep Compliant Control for Legged Robots · ICRA 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
recovery stage training · 0.8deep reinforcement learning · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Deep Compliant Control for Legged RobotsabstractControl policies trained using deep reinforcement learning often generate stiff, high-frequency motions in response to unexpected disturbances. To promote more natural and compliant balance recovery strategies, we propose a simple modification to the typical reinforcement learning training process. Our key insight is that stiff responses to perturbations are due to an agent’s incentive to maximize task rewards at all times, even as perturbations are being applied. As an alternative, we introduce an explicit recovery stage where tracking rewards are given irrespective of the motions generated by the control policy. This allows agents a chance to gradually recover from disturbances before attempting to carry out their main tasks. Through an in-depth analysis, we highlight both the compliant nature of the resulting control policies, as well as the benefits that compliance brings to legged locomotion. In our simulation and hardware experiments, the compliant policy achieves more robust, energy-efficient, and safe interactions with the environment. Adrian Hartmann, Dongho Kang, Fatemeh Zargarbashi, Miguel Zamora, Stelian Coros |
ICRA | 1 |