Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Shiqing Gao
dblp:383/5634
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
3as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 first-author · 3 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Reinforcement learning · 95% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 5% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
constrained reinforcement learning |
2.5 | 3 | 2025 | Extreme Value Policy Optimization for Safe Reinforcement Learning · ICML 2025 Controlling Underestimation Bias in Constrained Reinforcement Learning for Safe Exploration · ICML 2025 Exterior Penalty Policy Optimization with Penalty Metric Network under Constraints · IJCAI 2024 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › safe reinforcement learning
safe exploration |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Controlling Underestimation Bias in Constrained Reinforcement Learning for Safe Exploration · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
safe reinforcement learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Extreme Value Policy Optimization for Safe Reinforcement Learning · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
policy optimization |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Exterior Penalty Policy Optimization with Penalty Metric Network under Constraints · IJCAI 2024 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
extreme value theory |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Extreme Value Policy Optimization for Safe Reinforcement Learning · ICML 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
trust region optimization · 0.9pseudo-count · 0.9intrinsic cost · 0.9extreme quantile optimization · 0.9extreme prioritization replay · 0.9penalty metric network · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Controlling Underestimation Bias in Constrained Reinforcement Learning for Safe ExplorationabstractConstrained Reinforcement Learning (CRL) aims to maximize cumulative rewards while satisfying constraints. However, existing CRL algorithms often encounter significant constraint violations during training, limiting their applicability in safety-critical scenarios. In this paper, we identify the underestimation of the cost value function as a key factor contributing to these violations. To address this issue, we propose the Memory-driven Intrinsic Cost Estimation (MICE) method, which introduces intrinsic costs to mitigate underestimation and control bias to promote safer exploration. Inspired by flashbulb memory, where humans vividly recall dangerous experiences to avoid risks, MICE constructs a memory module that stores previously explored unsafe states to identify high-cost regions. The intrinsic cost is formulated as the pseudo-count of the current state visiting these risk regions. Furthermore, we propose an extrinsic-intrinsic cost value function that incorporates intrinsic costs and adopts a bias correction strategy. Using this function, we formulate an optimization objective within the trust region, along with corresponding optimization methods. Theoretically, we provide convergence guarantees for the proposed cost value function and establish the worst-case constraint violation for the MICE update. Extensive experiments demonstrate that MICE significantly reduces constraint violations while preserving policy performance comparable to baselines. Shiqing Gao, Jiaxin Ding 0001, Luoyi Fu, Xinbing Wang |
ICML | 1 |
| 2025 | Extreme Value Policy Optimization for Safe Reinforcement LearningabstractEnsuring safety is a critical challenge in applying Reinforcement Learning (RL) to real-world scenarios. Constrained Reinforcement Learning (CRL) addresses this by maximizing returns under predefined constraints, typically formulated as the expected cumulative cost. However, expectation-based constraints overlook rare but high-impact extreme value events in the tail distribution, such as black swan incidents, which can lead to severe constraint violations. To address this issue, we propose the Extreme Value policy Optimization (EVO) algorithm, leveraging Extreme Value Theory (EVT) to model and exploit extreme reward and cost samples, reducing constraint violations. EVO introduces an extreme quantile optimization objective to explicitly capture extreme samples in the cost tail distribution. Additionally, we propose an extreme prioritization mechanism during replay, amplifying the learning signal from rare but high-impact extreme samples. Theoretically, we establish upper bounds on expected constraint violations during policy updates, guaranteeing strict constraint satisfaction at a zero-violation quantile level. Further, we demonstrate that EVO achieves a lower probability of constraint violations than expectation-based methods and exhibits lower variance than quantile regression methods. Extensive experiments show that EVO significantly reduces constraint violations during training while maintaining competitive policy performance compared to baselines. Shiqing Gao, Yihang Zhou, Haoyu Luo, Yiheng Bing, Jiaxin Ding 0001, Luoyi Fu, Xinbing Wang |
ICML | 1 |
| 2024 | Exterior Penalty Policy Optimization with Penalty Metric Network under Constraints
Shiqing Gao, Jiaxin Ding 0001, Luoyi Fu, Xinbing Wang, Chenghu Zhou |
IJCAI | 1 |