Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Julia Machnio
dblp:383/6809
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Efficient and distributed learning · 33% Trustworthy machine learning · 33% Learning theory · 33% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
active learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | To Label or Not to Label: PALM - a Predictive Model for Evaluating Sample Efficiency in Active Learning Models · ICCV 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | To Label or Not to Label: PALM - a Predictive Model for Evaluating Sample Efficiency in Active Learning Models · ICCV 2025 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › learning dynamics
learning curve prediction |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | To Label or Not to Label: PALM - a Predictive Model for Evaluating Sample Efficiency in Active Learning Models · ICCV 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
self-supervised embedding · 0.9mathematical modeling · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | To Label or Not to Label: PALM - a Predictive Model for Evaluating Sample Efficiency in Active Learning ModelsabstractActive learning (AL) seeks to reduce annotation costs by selecting the most informative samples for labeling, making it particularly valuable in resource-constrained settings. However, traditional evaluation methods, which focus solely on final accuracy, fail to capture the full dynamics of the learning process. To address this gap, we propose PALM (Performance Analysis of Active Learning Models), a unified and interpretable mathematical model that characterizes AL trajectories through four key parameters: achievable accuracy, coverage efficiency, early-stage performance, and scalability. PALM provides a predictive description of AL behavior from partial observations, enabling the estimation of future performance and facilitating principled comparisons across different strategies. We validate PALM through extensive experiments on CIFAR-10/100 and ImageNet-50/100/200, covering a wide range of AL methods and self-supervised embeddings. Our results demonstrate that PALM generalizes effectively across datasets, budgets, and strategies, accurately predicting full learning curves from limited labeled data. Importantly, PALM reveals crucial insights into learning efficiency, data space coverage, and the scalability of AL methods. By enabling the selection of cost-effective strategies and predicting performance under tight budget constraints, PALM lays the basis for more systematic, reproducible, and data-efficient evaluation of AL in both research and real-world applications. The code is available at: https://github.com/juliamachnio/PALM. Julia Machnio, Mads Nielsen, Mostafa Mehdipour-Ghazi |
ICCV | 1 |