Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Julia Machnio

dblp:383/6809 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Efficient and distributed learning · 33% Trustworthy machine learning · 33% Learning theory · 33%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
active learning
0.912025
To Label or Not to Label: PALM - a Predictive Model for Evaluating Sample Efficiency in Active Learning Models · ICCV 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability
0.912025
To Label or Not to Label: PALM - a Predictive Model for Evaluating Sample Efficiency in Active Learning Models · ICCV 2025
Machine learning › Learning theory › learning dynamics
learning curve prediction
0.912025
To Label or Not to Label: PALM - a Predictive Model for Evaluating Sample Efficiency in Active Learning Models · ICCV 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

self-supervised embedding · 0.9mathematical modeling · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 To Label or Not to Label: PALM - a Predictive Model for Evaluating Sample Efficiency in Active Learning Models
abstract
Active learning (AL) seeks to reduce annotation costs by selecting the most informative samples for labeling, making it particularly valuable in resource-constrained settings. However, traditional evaluation methods, which focus solely on final accuracy, fail to capture the full dynamics of the learning process. To address this gap, we propose PALM (Performance Analysis of Active Learning Models), a unified and interpretable mathematical model that characterizes AL trajectories through four key parameters: achievable accuracy, coverage efficiency, early-stage performance, and scalability. PALM provides a predictive description of AL behavior from partial observations, enabling the estimation of future performance and facilitating principled comparisons across different strategies. We validate PALM through extensive experiments on CIFAR-10/100 and ImageNet-50/100/200, covering a wide range of AL methods and self-supervised embeddings. Our results demonstrate that PALM generalizes effectively across datasets, budgets, and strategies, accurately predicting full learning curves from limited labeled data. Importantly, PALM reveals crucial insights into learning efficiency, data space coverage, and the scalability of AL methods. By enabling the selection of cost-effective strategies and predicting performance under tight budget constraints, PALM lays the basis for more systematic, reproducible, and data-efficient evaluation of AL in both research and real-world applications. The code is available at: https://github.com/juliamachnio/PALM.
Julia Machnio, Mads Nielsen, Mostafa Mehdipour-Ghazi
ICCV1