Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Hanbin He

dblp:383/6931 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0004-0871-9041ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Distributed systems · 87% Cloud and datacenter computing · 13%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Debugging and program repair · 50% Services computing and microservices · 50%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Services computing and microservices › microservice architecture
microservice failure diagnosis
1.012026
TVDiag: A Task-oriented and View-invariant Failure Diagnosis Framework for Microservice-based Systems with Multimodal Data · ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. 2026
Debugging and program repair
root cause analysis
1.012026
TVDiag: A Task-oriented and View-invariant Failure Diagnosis Framework for Microservice-based Systems with Multimodal Data · ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. 2026
Distributed systems
fault tolerance
1.012026
TVDiag: A Task-oriented and View-invariant Failure Diagnosis Framework for Microservice-based Systems with Multimodal Data · ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. 2026
Distributed systems › root cause analysis
root cause localization
1.012026
TVDiag: A Task-oriented and View-invariant Failure Diagnosis Framework for Microservice-based Systems with Multimodal Data · ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

task-oriented learning · 2.0graph-level data augmentation · 2.0contrastive learning · 2.0multimodal data fusion · 1.0multi-modal data fusion · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 TVDiag: A Task-oriented and View-invariant Failure Diagnosis Framework for Microservice-based Systems with Multimodal Data
abstract
Microservice-based systems often suffer from reliability issues due to their intricate interactions and expanding scale. With the rapid growth of observability techniques, various methods have been proposed to achieve failure diagnosis, including root cause localization and failure type identification, by leveraging diverse monitoring data such as logs, metrics, or traces. However, traditional failure diagnosis methods that use single-modal data can hardly cover all failure scenarios due to the restricted information. Several failure diagnosis methods have been recently proposed to integrate multimodal data based on deep learning. These methods, however, tend to combine modalities indiscriminately and treat them equally in failure diagnosis, ignoring the relationship between specific modalities and different diagnostic tasks. This oversight hinders the effective utilization of the unique advantages offered by each modality. To address the limitation, we propose TVDiag , a multimodal failure diagnosis framework for locating culprit microservice instances and identifying their failure types (e.g., Net-packets Corruption) in microservice-based systems. TVDiag employs task-oriented learning to enhance the potential advantages of each modality and establishes cross-modal associations based on contrastive learning to extract view-invariant failure information. Furthermore, we develop a graph-level data augmentation strategy that randomly inactivates the observability of some normal microservice instances to mitigate the shortage of training data. Experimental results on four datasets show that TVDiag outperforms the state-of-the-art methods in multimodal failure diagnosis by at least 20.16% and 3.08% in terms of \(HR@1\) and F1-score, respectively.
Shuaiyu Xie, Jian Wang 0018, Hanbin He, Zhihao Wang 0002, Yuqi Zhao 0001, Neng Zhang 0001, Bing Li 0010
ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol.3