Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Gagan Jain

dblp:383/7063 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0007-8394-9543ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 1 first-author · 4 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Efficient and distributed learning · 55% Generative modeling · 25% Deep learning architectures and training · 14%

Topics — the 9 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
inference efficiency
0.912025
Masked Generative Nested Transformers with Decode Time Scaling · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Generative modeling › masked generative modeling
masked generative transformer
0.912025
Masked Generative Nested Transformers with Decode Time Scaling · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Generative modeling
visual generation
0.912025
Masked Generative Nested Transformers with Decode Time Scaling · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
adaptive computation
0.812024
Mixture of Nested Experts: Adaptive Processing of Visual Tokens · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
mixture of experts
0.812024
Mixture of Nested Experts: Adaptive Processing of Visual Tokens · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model compression
0.812024
LookupViT: Compressing Visual Information to a Limited Number of Tokens · ECCV (86) 2024
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression
token compression
0.812024
LookupViT: Compressing Visual Information to a Limited Number of Tokens · ECCV (86) 2024
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › efficient visual recognition
efficient vision transformer inference
0.212024
Mixture of Nested Experts: Adaptive Processing of Visual Tokens · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › transformer
vision transformer
0.212024
LookupViT: Compressing Visual Information to a Limited Number of Tokens · ECCV (86) 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

parameter sharing · 0.9computation caching · 0.9vision transformer · 0.8token compression · 0.8mixture of experts · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Masked Generative Nested Transformers with Decode Time Scaling
abstract
Recent advances in visual generation have made significant strides in producing content of exceptional quality. However, most methods suffer from a fundamental problem - a bottleneck of inference computational efficiency. Most of these algorithms involve multiple passes over a transformer model to generate tokens or denoise inputs. However, the model size is kept consistent throughout all iterations, which makes it computationally expensive. In this work, we aim to address this issue primarily through two key ideas - (a) not all parts of the generation process need equal compute, and we design a decode time model scaling schedule to utilize compute effectively, and (b) we can cache and reuse some of the intermediate computation. Combining these two ideas leads to using smaller models to process more tokens while large models process fewer tokens. These different-sized models do not increase the parameter size, as they share parameters. We rigorously experiment with ImageNet256$\times$256 , UCF101, and Kinetics600 to showcase the efficacy of the proposed method for image/video generation and frame prediction. Our experiments show that with almost $3\times$ less compute than baseline, our model obtains competitive performance.
Sahil Goyal, Debapriya Tula, Gagan Jain, Pradeep Shenoy, Prateek Jain 0002, Sujoy Paul
ICML3
2025 Bayesian Collaborative Bandits with Thompson Sampling for Improved Outreach in Maternal Health
Arpan Dasgupta, Gagan Jain, Arun Suggala, Karthikeyan Shanmugam 0001, Milind Tambe, Aparna Taneja
AAMAS2
2024 LookupViT: Compressing Visual Information to a Limited Number of Tokens
Rajat Koner, Gagan Jain, Prateek Jain 0002, Volker Tresp, Sujoy Paul
ECCV (86)2
2024 Mixture of Nested Experts: Adaptive Processing of Visual Tokens
abstract
The visual medium (images and videos) naturally contains a large amount of information redundancy, thereby providing a great opportunity for leveraging efficiency in processing. While Vision Transformer (ViT) based models scale effectively to large data regimes, they fail to capitalize on this inherent redundancy, leading to higher computational costs. Mixture of Experts (MoE) networks demonstrate scalability while maintaining same inference-time costs, but they come with a larger parameter footprint. We present Mixture of Nested Experts (MoNE), which utilizes a nested structure for experts, wherein individual experts fall on an increasing compute-accuracy curve. Given a compute budget, MoNE learns to dynamically choose tokens in a priority order, and thus redundant tokens are processed through cheaper nested experts. Using this framework, we achieve equivalent performance as the baseline models, while reducing inference time compute by over two-fold. We validate our approach on standard image and video datasets - ImageNet-21K, Kinetics400, and Something-Something-v2. We further highlight MoNE's adaptability by showcasing its ability to maintain strong performance across different inference-time compute budgets on videos, using only a single trained model.
Gagan Jain, Nidhi Hegde 0003, Aditya Kusupati, Arsha Nagrani, Shyamal Buch, Prateek Jain 0002, Anurag Arnab, Sujoy Paul
NeurIPS1