Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Ting-Chih Chen

dblp:383/7710 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
0009-0002-3900-3762ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Language models and text generation · 40% Vision and language · 40% Information extraction and text analysis · 20%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Information retrieval · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
fact-checking
0.812024
M3D: MultiModal MultiDocument Fine-Grained Inconsistency Detection · EMNLP 2024
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text summarization
multi-document summarization
0.812024
MetaSumPerceiver: Multimodal Multi-Document Evidence Summarization for Fact-Checking · ACL (1) 2024
Computer vision › Vision and language
multimodal reasoning
0.812024
M3D: MultiModal MultiDocument Fine-Grained Inconsistency Detection · EMNLP 2024
Computer vision › Vision and language › vision-language generation
multimodal summarization
0.812024
MetaSumPerceiver: Multimodal Multi-Document Evidence Summarization for Fact-Checking · ACL (1) 2024
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
text summarization
0.812024
MetaSumPerceiver: Multimodal Multi-Document Evidence Summarization for Fact-Checking · ACL (1) 2024
Information retrieval
multimedia analysis and retrieval
0.212024
MetaSumPerceiver: Multimodal Multi-Document Evidence Summarization for Fact-Checking · ACL (1) 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

reinforcement learning · 1.5perceiver · 1.5entailment objective · 1.5multimodal document reasoning · 0.8claim synthesis · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 MetaSumPerceiver: Multimodal Multi-Document Evidence Summarization for Fact-Checking
abstract
Fact-checking real-world claims often requires reviewing multiple multimodal documents to assess a claim's truthfulness, which is a highly laborious and time-consuming task.In this paper, we present a summarization model designed to generate claim-specific summaries useful for fact-checking from multimodal, multi-document datasets.The model takes inputs in the form of documents, images, and a claim, with the objective of assisting in fact-checking tasks.We introduce a dynamic perceiver-based model that can handle inputs from multiple modalities of arbitrary lengths.To train our model, we leverage a novel reinforcement learning-based entailment objective to generate summaries that provide evidence distinguishing between different truthfulness labels.To assess the efficacy of our approach, we conduct experiments on both an existing benchmark and a new dataset of multi-document claims that we contribute.Our approach outperforms the SOTA approach by 4.6% in the claim verification task on the MOCHEG dataset and demonstrates strong performance on our new Multi-News-Fact-Checking dataset.
Ting-Chih Chen, Chia-Wei Tang, Christopher Thomas 0004
ACL (1)1
2024 M3D: MultiModal MultiDocument Fine-Grained Inconsistency Detection
abstract
Validating claims from misinformation is a highly challenging task that involves understanding how each factual assertion within the claim relates to a set of trusted source materials. Existing approaches often make coarse-grained predictions but fail to identify the specific aspects of the claim that are troublesome and the specific evidence relied upon. In this paper, we introduce a method and new benchmark for this challenging task. Our method predicts the fine-grained logical relationship of each aspect of the claim from a set of multimodal documents, which include text, image(s), video(s), and audio(s). We also introduce a new benchmark (M^3DC) of claims requiring multimodal multidocument reasoning, which we construct using a novel claim synthesis technique. Experiments show that our approach significantly outperforms state-of-the-art baselines on this challenging task on two benchmarks while providing finer-grained predictions, explanations, and evidence.
Chia-Wei Tang, Ting-Chih Chen, Kiet Nguyen, Kazi Sajeed Mehrab, Alvi Md. Ishmam, Christopher Thomas 0004
EMNLP2