Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Catherine Cao

dblp:383/8039 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Machine learning and data management · 100%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Program synthesis and code generation · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning and data management › data annotation
automated labeling
0.812024
The ALCHEmist: Automated Labeling 500x CHEaper than LLM Data Annotators · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning and data management
data annotation
0.812024
The ALCHEmist: Automated Labeling 500x CHEaper than LLM Data Annotators · NeurIPS 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

program synthesis · 1.5large language model · 1.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 The ALCHEmist: Automated Labeling 500x CHEaper than LLM Data Annotators
abstract
Large pretrained models can be used as annotators, helping replace or augment crowdworkers and enabling distilling generalist models into smaller specialist models. Unfortunately, this comes at a cost: employing top-of-the-line models often requires paying thousands of dollars for API calls, while the resulting datasets are static and challenging to audit. To address these challenges, we propose a simple alternative: rather than directly querying labels from pretrained models, we task models to generate programs that can produce labels. These programs can be stored and applied locally, re-used and extended, and cost orders of magnitude less. Our system, $\textbf{Alchemist}$, obtains comparable to or better performance than large language model-based annotation in a range of tasks for a fraction of the cost: on average, improvements amount to a $\textbf{12.9}$% enhancement while the total labeling costs across all datasets are reduced by a factor of approximately $\textbf{500}\times$.
Tzu-Heng Huang, Catherine Cao, Vaishnavi Bhargava, Frederic Sala
NeurIPS2