Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Catherine Cao
dblp:383/8039
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Machine learning and data management · 100% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Program synthesis and code generation · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning and data management › data annotation
automated labeling |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | The ALCHEmist: Automated Labeling 500x CHEaper than LLM Data Annotators · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning and data management
data annotation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | The ALCHEmist: Automated Labeling 500x CHEaper than LLM Data Annotators · NeurIPS 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
program synthesis · 1.5large language model · 1.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | The ALCHEmist: Automated Labeling 500x CHEaper than LLM Data AnnotatorsabstractLarge pretrained models can be used as annotators, helping replace or augment crowdworkers and enabling distilling generalist models into smaller specialist models. Unfortunately, this comes at a cost: employing top-of-the-line models often requires paying thousands of dollars for API calls, while the resulting datasets are static and challenging to audit. To address these challenges, we propose a simple alternative: rather than directly querying labels from pretrained models, we task models to generate programs that can produce labels. These programs can be stored and applied locally, re-used and extended, and cost orders of magnitude less. Our system, $\textbf{Alchemist}$, obtains comparable to or better performance than large language model-based annotation in a range of tasks for a fraction of the cost: on average, improvements amount to a $\textbf{12.9}$% enhancement while the total labeling costs across all datasets are reduced by a factor of approximately $\textbf{500}\times$. Tzu-Heng Huang, Catherine Cao, Vaishnavi Bhargava, Frederic Sala |
NeurIPS | 2 |