EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Ingeol Baek
dblp:383/8099
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Vision and language · 50% Language models and text generation · 33% Information extraction and text analysis · 17% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › in-context learning
demonstration selection |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | SAFE-SQL: Self-Augmented In-Context Learning with Fine-grained Example Selection for Text-to-SQL · EMNLP 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
in-context learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | SAFE-SQL: Self-Augmented In-Context Learning with Fine-grained Example Selection for Text-to-SQL · EMNLP 2025 |
Computer vision › Vision and language › vision-language model
multimodal large language model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | How Do Large Vision-Language Models See Text in Image? Unveiling the Distinctive Role of OCR Heads · EMNLP 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › semantic parsing
text-to-SQL |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | SAFE-SQL: Self-Augmented In-Context Learning with Fine-grained Example Selection for Text-to-SQL · EMNLP 2025 |
Computer vision › Vision and language › vision-language model
vision-language model interpretability |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | How Do Large Vision-Language Models See Text in Image? Unveiling the Distinctive Role of OCR Heads · EMNLP 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
self-augmentation · 0.9large language model · 0.9fine-grained example selection · 0.9chain-of-thought · 0.9attention head analysis · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | How Do Large Vision-Language Models See Text in Image? Unveiling the Distinctive Role of OCR HeadsabstractDespite significant advancements in Large Vision Language Models (LVLMs), a gap remains, particularly regarding their interpretability and how they locate and interpret textual information within images.In this paper, we explore various LVLMs to identify the specific heads responsible for recognizing text from images, which we term the Optical Character Recognition Head (OCR Head).Our findings regarding these heads are as follows:(1) Less Sparse: Unlike previous retrieval heads, a large number of heads are activated to extract textual information from images.(2) Qualitatively Distinct: OCR heads possess properties that differ significantly from general retrieval heads, exhibiting low similarity in their characteristics.(3) Statically Activated: The frequency of activation for these heads closely aligns with their OCR scores.We validate our findings in downstream tasks by applying Chain-of-Thought (CoT) to both OCR and conventional retrieval heads and by masking these heads.We also demonstrate that redistributing sink-token values within the OCR heads improves performance.These insights provide a deeper understanding of the internal mechanisms LVLMs employ in processing embedded textual information in images. Ingeol Baek, Hwan Chang, Sunghyun Ryu, Hwanhee Lee |
EMNLP | 1 |
| 2025 | SAFE-SQL: Self-Augmented In-Context Learning with Fine-grained Example Selection for Text-to-SQLabstractText-to-SQL aims to convert natural language questions into executable SQL queries.While previous approaches, such as skeleton-masked selection, have demonstrated strong performance by retrieving similar training examples to guide large language models (LLMs), they struggle in real-world scenarios where such examples are unavailable.To overcome this limitation, we propose Self-Augmentation incontext learning with Fine-grained Example selection for Text-to-SQL (SAFE-SQL), a novel unsupervised framework that enhances SQL generation by generating and intelligently filtering self-augmented examples.SAFE-SQL leverages an LLM to generate diverse Textto-SQL examples, which are then filtered by a novel fine-grained mechanism using criteria for semantic similarity, structural alignment, and reasoning path quality to curate highquality in-context learning examples.Leveraging these carefully selected self-generated examples, SAFE-SQL significantly surpasses previous zero-shot and few-shot Text-to-SQL frameworks, achieving superior execution accuracy.Notably, our approach demonstrates substantial performance gains in challenging extra hard and unseen scenarios, where conventional methods often struggle. Jimin Lee 0001, Ingeol Baek, Byeongjeong Kim, Hyunkyung Bae, Hwanhee Lee |
EMNLP | 2 |