Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Andrea Bertazzi

dblp:383/9455 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
3as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 first-author · 3 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 87% Generative modeling · 13%
Network and information security
1 paper
Privacy and data protection · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods
markov chain monte carlo
1.722025
Piecewise deterministic sampling with splitting schemes · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025
Differential Privacy Guarantees of Markov Chain Monte Carlo Algorithms · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods › markov chain monte carlo
piecewise deterministic markov process sampler
1.622025
Piecewise deterministic sampling with splitting schemes · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025
Piecewise deterministic generative models · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods › markov chain monte carlo
langevin dynamics
0.912025
Differential Privacy Guarantees of Markov Chain Monte Carlo Algorithms · ICML 2025
Privacy and data protection
differential privacy
0.912025
Differential Privacy Guarantees of Markov Chain Monte Carlo Algorithms · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Generative modeling
generative model
0.812024
Piecewise deterministic generative models · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes
markov processes
0.812024
Piecewise deterministic generative models · NeurIPS 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

rényi differential privacy · 1.7girsanov's theorem · 1.7bouncy particle sampler · 1.6zig-zag sampler · 0.9metropolis-hastings · 0.9zig-zag process · 0.8randomized hamiltonian monte carlo · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Differential Privacy Guarantees of Markov Chain Monte Carlo Algorithms
abstract
This paper aims to provide differential privacy (DP) guarantees for Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) algorithms. In a first part, we establish DP guarantees on samples output by MCMC algorithms as well as Monte Carlo estimators associated with these methods under assumptions on the convergence properties of the underlying Markov chain. In particular, our results highlight the critical condition of ensuring the target distribution is differentially private itself. In a second part, we specialise our analysis to the unadjusted Langevin algorithm and stochastic gradient Langevin dynamics and establish guarantees on their (Rényi) DP. To this end, we develop a novel methodology based on Girsanov’s theorem combined with a perturbation trick to obtain bounds for an unbounded domain and in a non-convex setting. We establish: (i) uniform in $n$ privacy guarantees when the state of the chain after $n$ iterations is released, (ii) bounds on the privacy of the entire chain trajectory. These findings provide concrete guidelines for privacy-preserving MCMC.
Andrea Bertazzi, Tim Johnston, Gareth O. Roberts, Alain Durmus
ICML1
2025 Piecewise deterministic sampling with splitting schemes
abstract
We introduce Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) algorithms based on numerical approximations of piecewise-deterministic Markov processes obtained with the framework of splitting schemes. We present unadjusted as well as adjusted algorithms, for which the asymptotic bias due to the discretisation error is removed applying a non-reversible Metropolis-Hastings filter. In a general framework we demonstrate that the unadjusted schemes have weak error of second order in the step size, while typically maintaining a computational cost of only one gradient evaluation of the negative log-target function per iteration. Focusing then on unadjusted schemes based on the Bouncy Particle and Zig-Zag samplers, we provide conditions ensuring geometric ergodicity and consider the expansion of the invariant measure in terms of the step size. We analyse the dependence of the leading term in this expansion on the refreshment rate and on the structure of the splitting scheme, giving a guideline on which structure is best. Finally, we illustrate promising results for our samplers with numerical experiments on a Bayesian imaging inverse problem and a system of interacting particles.
Andrea Bertazzi, Paul Dobson, Pierre Monmarché
J. Mach. Learn. Res.1
2024 Piecewise deterministic generative models
abstract
We introduce a novel class of generative models based on piecewise deterministic Markov processes (PDMPs), a family of non-diffusive stochastic processes consisting of deterministic motion and random jumps at random times. Similarly to diffusions, such Markov processes admit time reversals that turn out to be PDMPs as well. We apply this observation to three PDMPs considered in the literature: the Zig-Zag process, Bouncy Particle Sampler, and Randomised Hamiltonian Monte Carlo. For these three particular instances, we show that the jump rates and kernels of the corresponding time reversals admit explicit expressions depending on some conditional densities of the PDMP under consideration before and after a jump. Based on these results, we propose efficient training procedures to learn these characteristics and consider methods to approximately simulate the reverse process. Finally, we provide bounds in the total variation distance between the data distribution and the resulting distribution of our model in the case where the base distribution is the standard $d$-dimensional Gaussian distribution. Promising numerical simulations support further investigations into this class of models.
Andrea Bertazzi, Dario Shariatian, Umut Simsekli, Eric Moulines, Alain Durmus
NeurIPS1