Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Antonio Iglesias

dblp:384/2434 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-6932-7007ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2 · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
2 papers
Requirements engineering and software design · 43% Empirical software engineering · 43% Software maintenance and evolution · 15%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Requirements engineering and software design
model-driven engineering
0.812024
A Systematic Literature Review of Model-Driven Engineering Using Machine Learning · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2024
Empirical software engineering
systematic literature review
0.812024
A Systematic Literature Review of Model-Driven Engineering Using Machine Learning · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2024
Software maintenance and evolution
feature location
0.312025
Introducing Phylogenetics in Search-based Software Engineering: Phylogenetics-aware SBSE · ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

phylogenetic inference · 0.9evolutionary computation · 0.9systematic literature review · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Introducing Phylogenetics in Search-based Software Engineering: Phylogenetics-aware SBSE
abstract
Phylogenetics studies the relationships, in terms of biological history and kinship, of a set of taxa (e.g., species). We argue that in Search-based Software Engineering (SBSE), the individuals of an evolutionary computation-driven population could be considered as taxa for which the leverage of Phylogenetic Inference might be beneficial. In this work, we present our Phylogenetics-aware SBSE approach. Our approach introduces a novel Phylogenetic Operation to promote results which are sufficiently aligned (in terms of lineage) with a certain reference given by the domain expert. Our approach is evaluated in two heterogeneous industrial case studies: Procedural Content Generation from Game Software Engineering, and Feature Location from Software Maintenance. The results are analyzed using quality-of-the-solution and acceptance-by-developers measurements. We performed a statistical analysis to determine whether the impact on the results is significant compared to baselines that do not leverage Phylogenetics. The results show that our approach significantly outperforms two baselines in both case studies. Furthermore, two focus groups confirmed the acceptance of our approach and stressed that solution acceptance may make the difference in industrial environments. Our work has the potential to motivate a new breed of research work on Phylogenetics awareness to produce better results in Software Engineering.
Daniel Blasco, Antonio Iglesias, Jorge Echeverría, Francisca Pérez 0001, Carlos Cetina
ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol.2
2024 A Systematic Literature Review of Model-Driven Engineering Using Machine Learning
abstract
Model-driven engineering (MDE) is a software engineering paradigm based on the systematic use of models. Over the past few years, engineers have significantly increased the use of MDE, which has been reported as a successful paradigm for developing industrial software. Recently, there have also been remarkable advancements in the Artificial Intelligence (AI) domain, with a significant increase in advanced Machine Learning (ML) techniques. The advances in both fields have led to a surge in works that dwell within the intersection of ML and MDE. This work places the focus on systematically reviewing works that leverage ML to solve MDE problems. We have reviewed a total of 9,194 papers, selecting 98 studies for further analysis. The results of our Systematic Literature Review (SLR) bring light to the current state of the art and trends in the field, discussing the drift in the usage of the different available ML techniques along with the remaining research gaps and open challenges. Our SLR has the potential to produce a positive impact in the research community by steering it towards ML techniques that have been successfully applied to solve MDE challenges.
Ana Cristina Marcén, Antonio Iglesias, Raúl Lapeña, Francisca Pérez 0001, Carlos Cetina
IEEE Trans. Software Eng.2