Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Antonio Iglesias
dblp:384/2434
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-6932-7007ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2 · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
2 papers |
Requirements engineering and software design · 43% Empirical software engineering · 43% Software maintenance and evolution · 15% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Requirements engineering and software design
model-driven engineering |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | A Systematic Literature Review of Model-Driven Engineering Using Machine Learning · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2024 |
Empirical software engineering
systematic literature review |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | A Systematic Literature Review of Model-Driven Engineering Using Machine Learning · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2024 |
Software maintenance and evolution
feature location |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Introducing Phylogenetics in Search-based Software Engineering: Phylogenetics-aware SBSE · ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
phylogenetic inference · 0.9evolutionary computation · 0.9systematic literature review · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Introducing Phylogenetics in Search-based Software Engineering: Phylogenetics-aware SBSEabstractPhylogenetics studies the relationships, in terms of biological history and kinship, of a set of taxa (e.g., species). We argue that in Search-based Software Engineering (SBSE), the individuals of an evolutionary computation-driven population could be considered as taxa for which the leverage of Phylogenetic Inference might be beneficial. In this work, we present our Phylogenetics-aware SBSE approach. Our approach introduces a novel Phylogenetic Operation to promote results which are sufficiently aligned (in terms of lineage) with a certain reference given by the domain expert. Our approach is evaluated in two heterogeneous industrial case studies: Procedural Content Generation from Game Software Engineering, and Feature Location from Software Maintenance. The results are analyzed using quality-of-the-solution and acceptance-by-developers measurements. We performed a statistical analysis to determine whether the impact on the results is significant compared to baselines that do not leverage Phylogenetics. The results show that our approach significantly outperforms two baselines in both case studies. Furthermore, two focus groups confirmed the acceptance of our approach and stressed that solution acceptance may make the difference in industrial environments. Our work has the potential to motivate a new breed of research work on Phylogenetics awareness to produce better results in Software Engineering. Daniel Blasco, Antonio Iglesias, Jorge Echeverría, Francisca Pérez 0001, Carlos Cetina |
ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. | 2 |
| 2024 | A Systematic Literature Review of Model-Driven Engineering Using Machine LearningabstractModel-driven engineering (MDE) is a software engineering paradigm based on the systematic use of models. Over the past few years, engineers have significantly increased the use of MDE, which has been reported as a successful paradigm for developing industrial software. Recently, there have also been remarkable advancements in the Artificial Intelligence (AI) domain, with a significant increase in advanced Machine Learning (ML) techniques. The advances in both fields have led to a surge in works that dwell within the intersection of ML and MDE. This work places the focus on systematically reviewing works that leverage ML to solve MDE problems. We have reviewed a total of 9,194 papers, selecting 98 studies for further analysis. The results of our Systematic Literature Review (SLR) bring light to the current state of the art and trends in the field, discussing the drift in the usage of the different available ML techniques along with the remaining research gaps and open challenges. Our SLR has the potential to produce a positive impact in the research community by steering it towards ML techniques that have been successfully applied to solve MDE challenges. Ana Cristina Marcén, Antonio Iglesias, Raúl Lapeña, Francisca Pérez 0001, Carlos Cetina |
IEEE Trans. Software Eng. | 2 |