EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Qixian Yu
dblp:384/4168
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Reinforcement learning · 46% Trustworthy machine learning · 32% Representation and self-supervised learning · 17% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
offline reinforcement learning |
1.6 | 2 | 2025 | Improving Generalization in Offline Reinforcement Learning via Latent Distribution Representation Learning · AAAI 2025 Improving Generalization in Offline Reinforcement Learning via Adversarial Data Splitting · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
distribution shift |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Improving Generalization in Offline Reinforcement Learning via Latent Distribution Representation Learning · AAAI 2025 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
invariant representation learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Improving Generalization in Offline Reinforcement Learning via Latent Distribution Representation Learning · AAAI 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
out-of-distribution generalization |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Improving Generalization in Offline Reinforcement Learning via Adversarial Data Splitting · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › offline reinforcement learning
pessimism |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Improving Generalization in Offline Reinforcement Learning via Adversarial Data Splitting · ICML 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
min-max adversarial training · 0.9generalization error bound · 0.9min-max optimization · 0.8meta-learning · 0.8adversarial data splitting · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Improving Generalization in Offline Reinforcement Learning via Latent Distribution Representation LearningabstractDealing with the distribution shift is a significant challenge when building offline reinforcement learning (RL) models that can generalize from a static dataset to out-of-distribution (OOD) scenarios. Previous approaches have employed pessimism or conservatism strategies. More recently, data-driven work has taken a distributional perspective, treating offline data as a domain adaptation problem. However, these methods use heuristic techniques to simulate distribution shifts, resulting in a limited diversity of artificially created distribution gaps. In this paper, we propose a novel perspective: offline datasets inherently contain multiple latent distributions, with behavior data from diverse policies potentially following different distributions and data from the same policy across various time phases also exhibiting distribution variance. We introduce the Latent Distribution Representation Learning (LAD) framework, which aims to characterize the multiple latent distributions within offline data and reduce the distribution gaps between any pair of them. LAD consists of a min-max adversarial process: it first identifies the "worst-case" distributions to enlarge the diversity of distribution gaps and then reduces these gaps to learn invariant representations for generalization. We derive a generalization error bound to support LAD theoretically and verify its effectiveness through extensive experiments. Lin Li 0090, Wei Wei 0018, Qixian Yu, Jianye Hao, Jiye Liang |
AAAI | 4 |
| 2024 | Improving Generalization in Offline Reinforcement Learning via Adversarial Data SplittingabstractOffline Reinforcement Learning (RL) commonly suffers from the out-of-distribution (OOD) overestimation issue due to the distribution shift. Prior work gradually shifts their focus from suppressing OOD overestimation to avoiding overly conservative learning from suboptimal behavior policies to improve generalization. However, most approaches explicitly delimit boundaries for OOD actions based on the support in the dataset, which can potentially impede the data near these boundaries from acquiring realistic estimates. This paper investigates how to loosen the rigid demarcation of OOD boundaries, adaptively extracting knowledge from empirical data to implicitly improve the model's generalization to nearby unseen data. We introduce an adversarial data splitting (ADS) framework that enforces the model to generalize the distribution shifts simulated from the train/validation subsets splitting of the dataset. Specifically, ADS is modeled as a min-max optimization problem inspired by meta-learning and solved by iterating over the following two steps. First, we train the model on the train-subset to minimize its loss on the validation-subset. Then, we adversarially generate the "hardest" train/validation subsets with the maximum distribution shift, making the model incapable of generalization at that splitting. We derive a generalization error bound for theoretically understanding ADS and verify the effectiveness with extensive experiments. Code is available at https://github.com/DkING-lv6/ADS. Lin Li 0090, Wei Wei 0018, Qixian Yu, Jianye Hao, Jiye Liang |
ICML | 4 |