EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Mim van den Bos
dblp:384/4172
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 50% Trustworthy machine learning · 50% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Algorithms and data structures · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
optimal decision tree |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Piecewise Constant and Linear Regression Trees: An Optimal Dynamic Programming Approach · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › regression
regression trees |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Piecewise Constant and Linear Regression Trees: An Optimal Dynamic Programming Approach · ICML 2024 |
Algorithms and data structures
dynamic programming |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Piecewise Constant and Linear Regression Trees: An Optimal Dynamic Programming Approach · ICML 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
piecewise linear regression · 1.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Piecewise Constant and Linear Regression Trees: An Optimal Dynamic Programming ApproachabstractRegression trees are a human-comprehensible machine-learning model that can represent complex relationships. They are typically trained using greedy heuristics because computing optimal regression trees is NP-hard. Contrary to this standard practice, we consider optimal methods and improve the scalability of optimal methods by developing three new dynamic programming approaches. First, we improve the performance of a piecewise constant regression tree method using a special algorithm for trees of depth two. Second, we provide the first optimal dynamic programming method for piecewise multiple linear regression. Third, we develop the first optimal method for piecewise simple linear regression, for which we also provide a special algorithm for trees of depth two. The experimental results show that our methods improve scalability by one or more orders of magnitude over the state-of-the-art optimal methods while performing similarly or better in out-of-sample performance. Mim van den Bos, Jacobus G. M. van der Linden, Emir Demirovic |
ICML | 1 |