Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Oscar Smee
dblp:384/4179
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Mathematical optimization
continuous optimization |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Inexact Newton-type Methods for Optimisation with Nonnegativity Constraints · ICML 2024 |
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization
newton-type methods |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Inexact Newton-type Methods for Optimisation with Nonnegativity Constraints · ICML 2024 |
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization
nonlinear optimization |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Inexact Newton-type Methods for Optimisation with Nonnegativity Constraints · ICML 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
two-metric projection · 0.8inexact newton method · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Inexact Newton-type Methods for Optimisation with Nonnegativity ConstraintsabstractWe consider solving large scale nonconvex optimisation problems with nonnegativity constraints. Such problems arise frequently in machine learning, such as nonnegative least-squares, nonnegative matrix factorisation, as well as problems with sparsity-inducing regularisation. In such settings, first-order methods, despite their simplicity, can be prohibitively slow on ill-conditioned problems or become trapped near saddle regions, while most second-order alternatives involve non-trivially challenging subproblems. The two-metric projection framework, initially proposed by Bertsekas (1982), alleviates these issues and achieves the best of both worlds by combining projected gradient steps at the boundary of the feasible region with Newton steps in the interior in such a way that feasibility can be maintained by simple projection onto the nonnegative orthant. We develop extensions of the two-metric projection framework, which by inexactly solving the subproblems as well as employing non-positive curvature directions, are suitable for large scale and nonconvex settings. We obtain state-of-the-art convergence rates for various classes of non-convex problems and demonstrate competitive practical performance on a variety of problems. Oscar Smee, Fred (Farbod) Roosta |
ICML | 1 |