Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Azza Fadhel

dblp:384/4221 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
3since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0008-5711-8962ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-author · 3 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Optimization for machine learning · 64% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 20% Efficient and distributed learning · 16%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers
Computational science and engineering · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › model-based optimization › bayesian optimization
surrogate model
1.822026
Nanoporous Materials Discovery via Search Bias-Guided Surrogate Modeling · AAAI 2026
Learning Surrogates for Offline Black-Box Optimization via Gradient Matching · ICML 2024
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › experimental design
adaptive experimental design
1.012026
Discovery of Feasible 3D Printing Configurations for Metal Alloys via AI-Driven Adaptive Experimental Design · AAAI 2026
Computational science and engineering › materials science
materials discovery
1.012026
Nanoporous Materials Discovery via Search Bias-Guided Surrogate Modeling · AAAI 2026
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
black-box optimization
0.812024
Learning Surrogates for Offline Black-Box Optimization via Gradient Matching · ICML 2024
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
gradient matching
0.812024
Learning Surrogates for Offline Black-Box Optimization via Gradient Matching · ICML 2024
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › model-based optimization
bayesian optimization
0.622026
Discovery of Feasible 3D Printing Configurations for Metal Alloys via AI-Driven Adaptive Experimental Design · AAAI 2026
Nanoporous Materials Discovery via Search Bias-Guided Surrogate Modeling · AAAI 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

surrogate modeling · 4.0value matching loss · 2.0optimization bias regularization · 2.0batch selection · 2.0adaptive experimental design · 2.0surrogate model · 0.8gradient matching · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Nanoporous Materials Discovery via Search Bias-Guided Surrogate Modeling
abstract
Nanoporous materials (NPMs) are suitable for solving some of the society's biggest challenges including carbon capture and conversion, storing hydrogen and methane, and sensing gases. The key challenge in discovering high-performing NPMs for a target application is that making and evaluating candidate NPMs requires performing resource-expensive wet-lab experiments. We consider the problem of discovering NPMs using existing experimental data of NPM evaluations. The overall goal is to find better NPMs than the best NPMs from the past experimental data. A simple approach is to create a surrogate model to match the objective values on the given dataset and employ it to score candidate NPMs to discover optimized NPMs. However, this surrogate model will fail because it does not have the appropriate search bias for the goal of optimization. To address this challenge, we propose a novel surrogate modeling approach that combines value matching loss with an optimization bias as regularizer. The key idea is to algorithmically realize search bias is to mimic the search behavior of monotonically increasing sequences of NPMs from the given dataset. Experiments on multiple real-world NPM discovery tasks demonstrate that our proposed surrogate model discovers significantly better NPMs than baselines including value matching surrogate model and one-step Bayesian optimization.
Azza Fadhel, Yassine Chemingui, Aryan Deshwal, Trong Nghia Hoang, Janardhan Rao Doppa
AAAI1
2026 Discovery of Feasible 3D Printing Configurations for Metal Alloys via AI-Driven Adaptive Experimental Design
abstract
Configuring the parameters of additive manufacturing processes for metal alloys is a challenging problem due to complex relationships between input parameters (e.g., laser power, scan speed) and quality of printed outputs. The standard trial-and-error approach to find feasible parameter configurations is highly inefficient because validating each configuration is expensive in terms of resources (physical and human labor) and the configuration space is very large. This paper combines the general principles of AI-driven adaptive experimental design with domain knowledge to address the challenging problem of discovering feasible configurations. The key idea is to build a surrogate model from past experiments to intelligently select a small batch of input configurations for validation in each iteration. To demonstrate the effectiveness of this methodology, we deploy it for Directed Energy Deposition process to print GRCop-42, a high-performance copper–chromium–niobium alloy developed by NASA for aerospace applications. Within three months, our approach yielded multiple defect-free outputs across a range of laser powers—dramatically reducing time-to-result and resource expenditure compared to several months of manual experimentation by domain scientists with no success. By enabling high-quality GRCop-42 fabrication on readily available infrared laser platforms for the first time, we democratize access to this critical alloy, paving the way for cost-effective, decentralized production for aerospace applications.
Azza Fadhel, Nathaniel W. Zuckschwerdt, Aryan Deshwal, Susmita Bose, Amit Bandyopadhyay, Janardhan Rao Doppa
AAAI1
2024 Learning Surrogates for Offline Black-Box Optimization via Gradient Matching
abstract
Offline design optimization problem arises in numerous science and engineering applications including material and chemical design, where expensive online experimentation necessitates the use of *in silico* surrogate functions to predict and maximize the target objective over candidate designs. Although these surrogates can be learned from offline data, their predictions are often inaccurate outside the offline data regime. This challenge raises a fundamental question about the impact of imperfect surrogate model on the performance gap between its optima and the true optima, and to what extent the performance loss can be mitigated. Although prior work developed methods to improve the robustness of surrogate models and their associated optimization processes, a provably quantifiable relationship between an imperfect surrogate and the corresponding performance gap, as well as whether prior methods directly address it, remain elusive. To shed light on this important question, we present a theoretical framework to understand offline black-box optimization, by explicitly bounding the optimization quality based on how well the surrogate matches the latent gradient field that underlines the offline data. Inspired by our theoretical analysis, we propose a principled black-box gradient matching algorithm to create effective surrogate models for offline optimization, improving over prior approaches on various real-world benchmarks.
Azza Fadhel, Aryan Deshwal, Janardhan Rao Doppa, Trong Nghia Hoang
ICML2