Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jingxin Hai

dblp:384/4313 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Graph learning · 44% Learning paradigms · 34% Deep learning architectures and training · 17%
Computer networks
1 paper
Edge and fog computing · 100%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › semi-supervised learning
pseudo-labeling
0.912025
Non-Stationary Predictions May Be More Informative: Exploring Pseudo-Labels with a Two-Phase Pattern of Training Dynamics · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
semi-supervised learning
0.912025
Non-Stationary Predictions May Be More Informative: Exploring Pseudo-Labels with a Two-Phase Pattern of Training Dynamics · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
training dynamics
0.912025
Non-Stationary Predictions May Be More Informative: Exploring Pseudo-Labels with a Two-Phase Pattern of Training Dynamics · ICML 2025
Edge and fog computing
edge machine learning
0.912025
Building Accurate and Interpretable Online Classifiers on Edge Devices · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2025
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph neural network
0.812024
Multi-Track Message Passing: Tackling Oversmoothing and Oversquashing in Graph Learning via Preventing Heterophily Mixing · ICML 2024
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network
message passing
0.812024
Multi-Track Message Passing: Tackling Oversmoothing and Oversquashing in Graph Learning via Preventing Heterophily Mixing · ICML 2024
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network › deep graph neural network
over-smoothing and over-squashing
0.812024
Multi-Track Message Passing: Tackling Oversmoothing and Oversquashing in Graph Learning via Preventing Heterophily Mixing · ICML 2024
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability
0.312025
Building Accurate and Interpretable Online Classifiers on Edge Devices · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

online learning · 1.7interpretable kernel · 1.7feature sketches · 1.7pseudo-labeling · 0.9loss function design · 0.9message passing · 0.8graph convolutional network · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Non-Stationary Predictions May Be More Informative: Exploring Pseudo-Labels with a Two-Phase Pattern of Training Dynamics
abstract
Pseudo-labeling is a widely used strategy in semi-supervised learning. Existing methods typically select predicted labels with high confidence scores and high training stationarity, as pseudo-labels to augment training sets. In contrast, this paper explores the pseudo-labeling potential of predicted labels that **do not** exhibit these characteristics. We discover a new type of predicted labels suitable for pseudo-labeling, termed *two-phase labels*, which exhibit a two-phase pattern during training: *they are initially predicted as one category in early training stages and switch to another category in subsequent epochs.* Case studies show the two-phase labels are informative for decision boundaries. To effectively identify the two-phase labels, we design a 2-*phasic* metric that mathematically characterizes their spatial and temporal patterns. Furthermore, we propose a loss function tailored for two-phase pseudo-labeling learning, allowing models not only to learn correct correlations but also to eliminate false ones. Extensive experiments on eight datasets show that **our proposed 2-*phasic* metric acts as a powerful booster** for existing pseudo-labeling methods by additionally incorporating the two-phase labels, achieving an average classification accuracy gain of 1.73% on image datasets and 1.92% on graph datasets.
Hongbin Pei, Jingxin Hai, Huiqi Deng, Denghao Ma, Jie Ma 0001, Pinghui Wang, Xiaohong Guan
ICML2
2025 Building Accurate and Interpretable Online Classifiers on Edge Devices
abstract
By integrating machine learning with edge devices, we can augment the capabilities of edge devices, such as IoT devices, household appliances, and wearable technologies. These edge devices generally operate on microcontrollers with inherently limited resources, such as constrained RAM capacity and limited computational power. Nonetheless, they often process data in a high-velocity stream fashion, exemplified by sequences of activities and statuses monitored by advanced industrial sensors. In practical scenarios, models must be interpretable to facilitate troubleshooting and behavior understanding. Implementing machine learning models on edge devices is valuable and challenging, striking a balance between model efficacy and resource constraint. To address this challenge, we introduce our novel Onfesk, which combines online learning algorithms with an innovative interpretable kernel. Specifically, our Onfesk trains an online classifier over the kernel's feature sketches. Benefiting from our specially designed modules, the kernel's feature sketches can be efficiently produced, and the memory requirements of the classifier can be significantly reduced. As a result, Onfesk delivers effective and efficient performance in environments with limited resources without compromising on model interpretability. Extensive experiments with diverse real-world datasets have shown that Onfesk outperforms state-of-the-art methods, achieving up to a 7.4% improvement in accuracy within identical memory constraints.
Pinghui Wang, Kuankuan Cheng, Junzhou Zhao, Jingxin Hai, Junlan Feng, Chao Deng 0002, Xidian Wang
IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst.6
2024 Multi-Track Message Passing: Tackling Oversmoothing and Oversquashing in Graph Learning via Preventing Heterophily Mixing
abstract
The advancement toward deeper graph neural networks is currently obscured by two inherent issues in message passing, oversmoothing and oversquashing. We identify the root cause of these issues as information loss due to heterophily mixing in aggregation, where messages of diverse category semantics are mixed. We propose a novel multi-track graph convolutional network to address oversmoothing and oversquashing effectively. Our basic idea is intuitive: if messages are separated and independently propagated according to their category semantics, heterophilic mixing can be prevented. Consequently, we present a novel multi-track message passing scheme capable of preventing heterophilic mixing, enhancing long-distance information flow, and improving separation condition. Empirical validations show that our model achieved state-of-the-art performance on several graph datasets and effectively tackled oversmoothing and oversquashing, setting a new benchmark of $86.4$% accuracy on Cora.
Hongbin Pei, Huiqi Deng, Jingxin Hai, Pinghui Wang, Jie Ma 0001, Yuheng Xiong, Xiaohong Guan
ICML4