Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Zi-Hao Zhou
dblp:384/4317
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 2 first-author · 4 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Learning paradigms · 39% Representation and self-supervised learning · 18% Trustworthy machine learning · 18% |
Topics — the 16 heaviest of 17, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
contrastive learning |
1.6 | 2 | 2025 | Weakly-Supervised Contrastive Learning for Imprecise Class Labels · ICML 2025 Continuous Contrastive Learning for Long-Tailed Semi-Supervised Recognition · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › class imbalance
long-tailed learning |
1.5 | 2 | 2024 | Continuous Contrastive Learning for Long-Tailed Semi-Supervised Recognition · NeurIPS 2024 Learning Label Shift Correction for Test-Agnostic Long-Tailed Recognition · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › continual learning
catastrophic forgetting |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | LADA: Scalable Label-Specific CLIP Adapter for Continual Learning · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
continual learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | LADA: Scalable Label-Specific CLIP Adapter for Continual Learning · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression › knowledge distillation
feature distillation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | LADA: Scalable Label-Specific CLIP Adapter for Continual Learning · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
learning with noisy labels |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Weakly-Supervised Contrastive Learning for Imprecise Class Labels · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › contrastive learning
supervised contrastive learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Weakly-Supervised Contrastive Learning for Imprecise Class Labels · ICML 2025 |
Computer vision › Vision and language
vision-language model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | LADA: Scalable Label-Specific CLIP Adapter for Continual Learning · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
distribution shift |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Learning Label Shift Correction for Test-Agnostic Long-Tailed Recognition · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
fairness |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Continuous Contrastive Learning for Long-Tailed Semi-Supervised Recognition · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
label shift |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Learning Label Shift Correction for Test-Agnostic Long-Tailed Recognition · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › label shift
label shift correction |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Learning Label Shift Correction for Test-Agnostic Long-Tailed Recognition · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
semi-supervised learning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Continuous Contrastive Learning for Long-Tailed Semi-Supervised Recognition · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › long-tailed recognition
test-agnostic long-tailed recognition |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Learning Label Shift Correction for Test-Agnostic Long-Tailed Recognition · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › weakly supervised learning
partial label learning |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Weakly-Supervised Contrastive Learning for Imprecise Class Labels · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
weakly supervised learning |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Weakly-Supervised Contrastive Learning for Imprecise Class Labels · ICML 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
semantic similarity · 0.9label-specific adapter · 0.9graph-theoretic framework · 0.9feature distillation · 0.9contrastive learning · 0.9CLIP · 0.9label shift correction · 0.8contrastive loss · 0.8class-balanced loss · 0.8black box shift estimation · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | LADA: Scalable Label-Specific CLIP Adapter for Continual LearningabstractContinual learning with vision-language models like CLIP offers a pathway toward scalable machine learning systems by leveraging its transferable representations. Existing CLIP-based methods adapt the pre-trained image encoder by adding multiple sets of learnable parameters, with each task using a partial set of parameters. This requires selecting the expected parameters for input images during inference, which is prone to error that degrades performance. To address this problem, we introduce LADA (Label-specific ADApter). Instead of partitioning parameters across tasks, LADA appends lightweight, label-specific memory units to the frozen CLIP image encoder, enabling discriminative feature generation by aggregating task-agnostic knowledge. To prevent catastrophic forgetting, LADA employs feature distillation for seen classes, preventing their features from being interfered with by new classes. Positioned after the image encoder, LADA prevents gradient flow to the frozen CLIP parameters, ensuring efficient training. Extensive results show that LADA achieves state-of-the-art performance in continual learning settings. The implementation code is available at https://github.com/MaolinLuo/LADA. Mao-Lin Luo, Zi-Hao Zhou, Tong Wei 0001, Min-Ling Zhang |
ICML | 2 |
| 2025 | Weakly-Supervised Contrastive Learning for Imprecise Class LabelsabstractContrastive learning has achieved remarkable success in learning effective representations, with supervised contrastive learning often outperforming self-supervised approaches. However, in real-world scenarios, data annotations are often ambiguous or inaccurate, meaning that class labels may not reliably indicate whether two examples belong to the same class. This limitation restricts the applicability of supervised contrastive learning. To address this challenge, we introduce the concept of “continuous semantic similarity” to define positive and negative pairs. Instead of directly relying on imprecise class labels, we measure the semantic similarity between example pairs, which quantifies how closely they belong to the same category by iteratively refining weak supervisory signals. Based on this concept, we propose a graph-theoretic framework for weakly-supervised contrastive learning, where semantic similarity serves as the graph weights. Our framework is highly versatile and can be applied to many weakly-supervised learning scenarios. We demonstrate its effectiveness through experiments in two common settings, i.e., noisy label and partial label learning, where existing methods can be easily integrated to significantly improve performance. Theoretically, we establish an error bound for our approach, showing that it can approximate supervised contrastive learning under mild conditions. The implementation code is available at https://github.com/Speechless-10308/WSC. Zi-Hao Zhou, Tong Wei 0001, Min-Ling Zhang |
ICML | 1 |
| 2024 | Learning Label Shift Correction for Test-Agnostic Long-Tailed RecognitionabstractLong-tail learning primarily focuses on mitigating the label distribution shift between long-tailed training data and uniformly distributed test data. However, in real-world applications, we often encounter a more intricate challenge where the test label distribution is agnostic. To address this problem, we first theoretically establish the substantial potential for reducing the generalization error if we can precisely estimate the test label distribution. Motivated by the theoretical insight, we introduce a simple yet effective solution called label shift correction (LSC). LSC estimates the test label distribution within the proposed framework of generalized black box shift estimation, and adjusts the predictions from a pre-trained model to align with the test distribution. Theoretical analyses confirm that accurate estimation of test label distribution can effectively reduce the generalization error. Extensive experimental results demonstrate that our method significantly outperforms previous state-of-the-art approaches, especially when confronted with non-uniform test label distribution. Notably, the proposed method is general and complements existing long-tail learning approaches, consistently improving their performance. The source code is available at https://github.com/Stomach-ache/label-shift-correction Tong Wei 0001, Zhen Mao, Zi-Hao Zhou, Yuanyu Wan, Min-Ling Zhang |
ICML | 3 |
| 2024 | Continuous Contrastive Learning for Long-Tailed Semi-Supervised RecognitionabstractLong-tailed semi-supervised learning poses a significant challenge in training models with limited labeled data exhibiting a long-tailed label distribution. Current state-of-the-art LTSSL approaches heavily rely on high-quality pseudo-labels for large-scale unlabeled data. However, these methods often neglect the impact of representations learned by the neural network and struggle with real-world unlabeled data, which typically follows a different distribution than labeled data. This paper introduces a novel probabilistic framework that unifies various recent proposals in long-tail learning. Our framework derives the class-balanced contrastive loss through Gaussian kernel density estimation. We introduce a continuous contrastive learning method, CCL, extending our framework to unlabeled data using *reliable* and *smoothed* pseudo-labels. By progressively estimating the underlying label distribution and optimizing its alignment with model predictions, we tackle the diverse distribution of unlabeled data in real-world scenarios. Extensive experiments across multiple datasets with varying unlabeled data distributions demonstrate that CCL consistently outperforms prior state-of-the-art methods, achieving over 4% improvement on the ImageNet-127 dataset. The supplementary material includes the source code for reproducibility. Zi-Hao Zhou, Siyuan Fang, Zi-Jing Zhou, Tong Wei 0001, Yuanyu Wan, Min-Ling Zhang |
NeurIPS | 1 |