Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Eleonora Bonel

dblp:384/4325 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Computational social science and digital humanities · 100%

Topics — the 1 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computational social science and digital humanities › misinformation
disinformation
0.812024
Position: Machine Learning-powered Assessments of the EU Digital Services Act Aid Quantify Policy Impacts on Online Harms · ICML 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

machine learning assessment · 0.8large language model · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Position: Machine Learning-powered Assessments of the EU Digital Services Act Aid Quantify Policy Impacts on Online Harms
abstract
While machine learning shows promise in automated knowledge generation, current techniques such as large language models and micro-targeted influence operations can be exploited for harmful purposes like the proliferation of disinformation. The European Union’s Digital Services Act (DSA) is an exemplary policy response addressing these harms generated by online platforms. In this regard, it necessitates a comprehensive evaluation of its impact on curbing the harmful downstream effects of these opaque practices. Despite their harmful applications, we argue that machine learning techniques offer immense, yet under-exploited, potential for unraveling the impacts of regulations like the DSA. Following an analysis that reveals possible limitations in the DSA’s provisions, we call for resolute efforts to address methodological barriers around appropriate data access, isolating marginal regulatory effects, and facilitating generalization across different contexts. Given the identified advantages of data-driven approaches to regulatory delivery, we advocate for machine learning research to help quantify the policy impacts on online harms.
Eleonora Bonel, Luca Nannini, Davide Bassi, Michele Joshua Maggini
ICML1