Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Eleonora Bonel
dblp:384/4325
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Computational social science and digital humanities · 100% |
Topics — the 1 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computational social science and digital humanities › misinformation
disinformation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Position: Machine Learning-powered Assessments of the EU Digital Services Act Aid Quantify Policy Impacts on Online Harms · ICML 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
machine learning assessment · 0.8large language model · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Position: Machine Learning-powered Assessments of the EU Digital Services Act Aid Quantify Policy Impacts on Online HarmsabstractWhile machine learning shows promise in automated knowledge generation, current techniques such as large language models and micro-targeted influence operations can be exploited for harmful purposes like the proliferation of disinformation. The European Union’s Digital Services Act (DSA) is an exemplary policy response addressing these harms generated by online platforms. In this regard, it necessitates a comprehensive evaluation of its impact on curbing the harmful downstream effects of these opaque practices. Despite their harmful applications, we argue that machine learning techniques offer immense, yet under-exploited, potential for unraveling the impacts of regulations like the DSA. Following an analysis that reveals possible limitations in the DSA’s provisions, we call for resolute efforts to address methodological barriers around appropriate data access, isolating marginal regulatory effects, and facilitating generalization across different contexts. Given the identified advantages of data-driven approaches to regulatory delivery, we advocate for machine learning research to help quantify the policy impacts on online harms. Eleonora Bonel, Luca Nannini, Davide Bassi, Michele Joshua Maggini |
ICML | 1 |