Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Shi Bo
dblp:384/6469
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Language models and text generation · 40% Question answering and dialogue systems · 20% Information extraction and text analysis · 20% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
coreference resolution |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Bridging Context Gaps: Leveraging Coreference Resolution for Long Contextual Understanding · ICLR 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems › machine reading comprehension
long-context question answering |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Bridging Context Gaps: Leveraging Coreference Resolution for Long Contextual Understanding · ICLR 2025 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
task planning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Tool-Planner: Task Planning with Clusters across Multiple Tools · ICLR 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › LLM agents
tool learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Tool-Planner: Task Planning with Clusters across Multiple Tools · ICLR 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › LLM agents › tool use
tool selection |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Tool-Planner: Task Planning with Clusters across Multiple Tools · ICLR 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
mention replacement · 0.9mention distance computation · 0.9large language model planning · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Bridging Context Gaps: Leveraging Coreference Resolution for Long Contextual UnderstandingabstractLarge language models (LLMs) have shown remarkable capabilities in natural language processing; however, they still face difficulties when tasked with understanding lengthy contexts and executing effective question answering. These challenges often arise due to the complexity and ambiguity present in longer texts. To enhance the performance of LLMs in such scenarios, we introduce the Long Question Coreference Adaptation (LQCA) method. This innovative framework focuses on coreference resolution tailored to long contexts, allowing the model to identify and manage references effectively. The LQCA method encompasses four key steps: resolving coreferences within sub-documents, computing the distances between mentions, defining a representative mention for coreference, and answering questions through mention replacement. By processing information systematically, the framework provides easier-to-handle partitions for LLMs, promoting better understanding. Experimental evaluations on a range of LLMs and datasets have yielded positive results, with a notable improvements on OpenAI-o1-mini and GPT-4o models, highlighting the effectiveness of leveraging coreference resolution to bridge context gaps in question answering. Our code is public at https://github.com/OceannTwT/LQCA. Yanming Liu 0003, Xinyue Peng, Jiannan Cao, Shi Bo, Yanxin Shen, Tianyu Du, Jianwei Yin, Xuhong Zhang 0002 |
ICLR | 4 |
| 2025 | Tool-Planner: Task Planning with Clusters across Multiple ToolsabstractLarge language models (LLMs) have demonstrated exceptional reasoning capabilities, enabling them to solve various complex problems. Recently, this ability has been applied to the paradigm of tool learning. Tool learning involves providing examples of tool usage and their corresponding functions, allowing LLMs to formulate plans and demonstrate the process of invoking and executing each tool. LLMs can address tasks that they cannot complete independently, thereby enhancing their potential across different tasks. However, this approach faces two key challenges. First, redundant error correction leads to unstable planning and long execution time. Additionally, designing a correct plan among multiple tools is also a challenge in tool learning. To address these issues, we propose Tool-Planner, a task-processing framework based on toolkits. Tool-Planner groups tools based on the API functions with the same function into a toolkit and allows LLMs to implement planning across the various toolkits. When a tool error occurs, the language model can reselect and adjust tools based on the toolkit. Experiments show that our approach demonstrates a high pass and win rate across different datasets and optimizes the planning scheme for tool learning in models such as GPT-4 and Claude 3, showcasing the potential of our method. Our code is public at
https://github.com/OceannTwT/Tool-Planner. Yanming Liu 0003, Xinyue Peng, Jiannan Cao, Shi Bo, Xuhong Zhang 0002, Jianwei Yin, Tianyu Du |
ICLR | 4 |