Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Adrien Fradin

dblp:384/7222 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0009-6592-5737ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Mathematical optimization · 77% Algorithms and data structures · 23%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Mathematical optimization › metaheuristic optimization
hyper-heuristics
0.912025
Speeding Up Hyper-Heuristics With Markov-Chain Operator Selection and the Only-Worsening Acceptance Operator · IJCAI 2025
Algorithms and data structures › runtime analysis
runtime analysis of evolutionary algorithms
0.312025
Speeding Up Hyper-Heuristics With Markov-Chain Operator Selection and the Only-Worsening Acceptance Operator · IJCAI 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

only-worsening acceptance operator · 0.9markov chain operator selection · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Unlearning Works Better Than You Think: Local Reinforcement-Based Selection of Auxiliary Objectives
abstract
We introduce Local Reinforcement-Based Selection of Auxiliary Objectives (LRSAO), a novel approach that selects auxiliary objectives using reinforcement learning (RL) to support the optimization process of an evolutionary algorithm (EA) as in EA+RL framework and furthermore incorporates the ability to unlearn previously used objectives. By modifying the reward mechanism to penalize moves that do no increase the fitness value and relying on the local auxiliary objectives, LRSAO dynamically adapts its selection strategy to optimize performance according to the landscape and unlearn previous objectives when necessary.
Matthieu Lerasle, Abderrahim Bendahi, Adrien Fradin
GECCO3
2025 Speeding Up Hyper-Heuristics With Markov-Chain Operator Selection and the Only-Worsening Acceptance Operator
abstract
The move-acceptance hyper-heuristic was recently shown to be able to leave local optima with astonishing efficiency (Lissovoi et al., Artificial Intelligence (2023)). In this work, we propose two modifications to this algorithm that demonstrate impressive performances on a large class of benchmarks including the classic CLIFF_d and JUMP_m function classes. (i) Instead of randomly choosing between the only-improving and any-move acceptance operator, we take this choice via a simple two-state Markov chain. This modification alone reduces the runtime on JUMP_m functions with gap parameter m from ?(n²ᵐ⁻¹) to O(nᵐ⁺¹). (ii) We then replace the all-moves acceptance operators with the operator that only accepts worsenings. Such a, counter-intuitive, operator has not been used before in the literature. However, our proofs show that our only-worsening operator can greatly help in leaving local optima, reducing, e.g., the runtime on Jump functions to O(n³ log n) independent of the gap size. In general, we prove a remarkably good runtime of O(nᵏ⁺¹ log n) for our Markov move-acceptance hyper-heuristic on all members of a new benchmark class SEQOPT_k, which contains a large number of functions having k successive local optima, and which contains the commonly studied JUMP_m and CLIFF_d functions for k=2.
Abderrahim Bendahi, Benjamin Doerr, Adrien Fradin, Johannes F. Lutzeyer
IJCAI3