EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Stephan Weißbach
dblp:384/7788
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
0009-0005-4347-952XORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology
deep learning-based segmentation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | ViNe-Seg: deep-learning-assisted segmentation of visible neurons and subsequent analysis embedded in a graphical user interface · Bioinform. 2024 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › bioimage informatics › cell segmentation
neuron segmentation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | ViNe-Seg: deep-learning-assisted segmentation of visible neurons and subsequent analysis embedded in a graphical user interface · Bioinform. 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
graphical user interface · 0.8deep learning · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | ViNe-Seg: deep-learning-assisted segmentation of visible neurons and subsequent analysis embedded in a graphical user interfaceabstractSUMMARY: Segmentation of neural somata is a crucial and usually the most time-consuming step in the analysis of optical functional imaging of neuronal microcircuits. In recent years, multiple auto-segmentation tools have been developed to improve the speed and consistency of the segmentation process, mostly, using deep learning approaches. Current segmentation tools, while advanced, still encounter challenges in producing accurate segmentation results, especially in datasets with a low signal-to-noise ratio. This has led to a reliance on manual segmentation techniques. However, manual methods, while customized to specific laboratory protocols, can introduce variability due to individual differences in interpretation, potentially affecting dataset consistency across studies. In response to this challenge, we present ViNe-Seg: a deep-learning-based semi-automatic segmentation tool that offers (i) detection of visible neurons, irrespective of their activity status; (ii) the ability to perform segmentation during an ongoing experiment; (iii) a user-friendly graphical interface that facilitates expert supervision, ensuring precise identification of Regions of Interest; (iv) an array of segmentation models with the option of training custom models and sharing them with the community; and (v) seamless integration of subsequent analysis steps. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: ViNe-Seg code and documentation are publicly available at https://github.com/NiRuff/ViNe-Seg and can be installed from https://pypi.org/project/ViNeSeg/. Nicolas Ruffini, Saleh Altahini, Stephan Weißbach, Nico Weber, Jonas Milkovits, Anna Wierczeiko, Hendrik Backhaus, Albrecht Stroh |
Bioinform. | 3 |
| 2024 | Cortexa: a comprehensive resource for studying gene expression and alternative splicing in the murine brainabstractBACKGROUND: Gene expression and alternative splicing are strictly regulated processes that shape brain development and determine the cellular identity of differentiated neural cell populations. Despite the availability of multiple valuable datasets, many functional implications, especially those related to alternative splicing, remain poorly understood. Moreover, neuroscientists working primarily experimentally often lack the bioinformatics expertise required to process alternative splicing data and produce meaningful and interpretable results. Notably, re-analyzing publicly available datasets and integrating them with in-house data can provide substantial novel insights. However, such analyses necessitate developing harmonized data handling and processing pipelines which in turn require considerable computational resources and in-depth bioinformatics expertise. RESULTS: Here, we present Cortexa-a comprehensive web portal that incorporates RNA-sequencing datasets from the mouse cerebral cortex (longitudinal or cell-specific) and the hippocampus. Cortexa facilitates understandable visualization of the expression and alternative splicing patterns of individual genes. Our platform provides SplicePCA-a tool that allows users to integrate their alternative splicing dataset and compare it to cell-specific or developmental neocortical splicing patterns. All standardized gene expression and alternative splicing datasets can be downloaded for further in-depth downstream analysis without the need for extensive preprocessing. CONCLUSIONS: Cortexa provides a robust and readily available resource for unraveling the complexity of gene expression and alternative splicing regulatory processes in the mouse brain. The data portal is available at https://cortexa-rna.com/. Stephan Weißbach, Jonas Milkovits, Stefan Pastore, Martin Heine, Susanne Gerber, Hristo Todorov |
BMC Bioinform. | 1 |