Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Runxi Cheng

dblp:385/1319 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
4since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 1 first-author · 4 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
4 papers
Efficient and distributed learning · 42% Language models and text generation · 34% Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 21%

Topics — the 9 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
knowledge editing
1.012026
Spectral Characterization and Mitigation of Sequential Knowledge Editing Collapse · ACL (1) 2026
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › knowledge editing
sequential model editing
1.012026
Spectral Characterization and Mitigation of Sequential Knowledge Editing Collapse · ACL (1) 2026
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
data selection
0.912025
HS-STaR: Hierarchical Sampling for Self-Taught Reasoners via Difficulty Estimation and Budget Reallocation · EMNLP 2025
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression
knowledge distillation
0.912025
Enhancing Logits Distillation with Plug&Play Kendall's τ Ranking Loss · ICML 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
mathematical reasoning
0.912025
HS-STaR: Hierarchical Sampling for Self-Taught Reasoners via Difficulty Estimation and Budget Reallocation · EMNLP 2025
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression › knowledge distillation
model distillation
0.912025
Enhancing Logits Distillation with Plug&Play Kendall's τ Ranking Loss · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model merging
0.912025
Whoever Started the interference Should End It: Guiding Data-Free Model Merging via Task Vectors · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › domain adaptation › unsupervised domain adaptation
self-training
0.912025
HS-STaR: Hierarchical Sampling for Self-Taught Reasoners via Difficulty Estimation and Budget Reallocation · EMNLP 2025
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
task vector
0.912025
Whoever Started the interference Should End It: Guiding Data-Free Model Merging via Task Vectors · ICML 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

spectral analysis · 1.0task vectors · 0.9self-taught reasoning · 0.9reward model · 0.9linear subspace · 0.9kendall's tau ranking loss · 0.9KL divergence · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Spectral Characterization and Mitigation of Sequential Knowledge Editing Collapse
abstract
Chi Zhang, Mengqi Zhang, Xiaotian Ye, Runxi Cheng, Zisheng Zhou, Ying Zhou, Pengjie Ren, Zhumin Chen. Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2026.
Chi Zhang 0102, Mengqi Zhang 0002, Xiaotian Ye, Runxi Cheng, Zisheng Zhou, Pengjie Ren, Zhumin Chen
ACL (1)4
2025 HS-STaR: Hierarchical Sampling for Self-Taught Reasoners via Difficulty Estimation and Budget Reallocation
abstract
Self-taught reasoners (STaRs) enhance the mathematical reasoning abilities of large language models (LLMs) by leveraging selfgenerated responses for self-training.Recent studies have incorporated reward models to guide response selection or decoding, aiming to obtain higher-quality data.However, they typically allocate a uniform sampling budget across all problems, overlooking the varying utility of problems at different difficulty levels.In this work, we conduct an empirical study and find that problems near the boundary of the LLM's reasoning capability offer significantly greater learning utility than both easy and overly difficult ones.To identify and exploit such problems, we propose HS-STAR, a Hierarchical Sampling framework for Self-Taught Reasoners.Given a fixed sampling budget, HS-STAR first performs lightweight presampling with a reward-guided difficulty estimation strategy to efficiently identify boundarylevel problems.Subsequently, it dynamically reallocates the remaining budget toward these high-utility problems during a re-sampling phase, maximizing the generation of valuable training data.Extensive experiments across multiple reasoning benchmarks and backbone LLMs demonstrate that HS-STAR significantly outperforms other baselines without requiring additional sampling budget.78 81 84 87 GSM8K 80.1 81.0 79.5 81.1 80.2 79.9 82.8 80.
Hongling Xu, Runxi Cheng, Xiangxiang Chu
EMNLP4
2025 Whoever Started the interference Should End It: Guiding Data-Free Model Merging via Task Vectors
abstract
Model merging seeks to integrate task-specific expert models into a unified architecture while preserving multi-task generalization capabilities, yet parameter interference between constituent models frequently induces performance degradation. Although prior work has explored many merging strategies, resolving interference without additional data for retraining or test-time computation remains challenging. In this paper, we theoretically demonstrate that the task vectors of the linear layer constitute an approximate linear subspace for its corresponding input. Therefore, we can minimize interference under the guidance of task vectors. Based on this insight, we propose WUDI-Merging (Whoever started the interference shoUld enD It), a simple yet effective model merging method that eliminates interference without any additional data or rescaling coefficients. Comprehensive empirical evaluations across vision and language benchmarks demonstrate our method’s superiority, achieving state-of-the-art performance in data-free model merging scenarios (average 10.9% improvement versus baseline methods) while even outperforming mainstream test-time adaptation approaches by 3.3%, and only very few computing resources are required. The source code and implementation details are available at https://github.com/nathanielyvo/WUDI-Merging.
Runxi Cheng, Yongxian Wei, Wanyun Zhu, Chun Yuan 0003
ICML1
2025 Enhancing Logits Distillation with Plug&Play Kendall's τ Ranking Loss
abstract
Knowledge distillation typically minimizes the Kullback–Leibler (KL) divergence between teacher and student logits. However, optimizing the KL divergence can be challenging for the student and often leads to sub-optimal solutions. We further show that gradients induced by KL divergence scale with the magnitude of the teacher logits, thereby diminishing updates on low-probability channels. This imbalance weakens the transfer of inter-class information and in turn limits the performance improvements achievable by the student. To mitigate this issue, we propose a plug-and-play auxiliary ranking loss based on Kendall’s $\tau$ coefficient that can be seamlessly integrated into any logit-based distillation framework. It supplies inter-class relational information while rebalancing gradients toward low-probability channels. We demonstrate that the proposed ranking loss is largely invariant to channel scaling and optimizes an objective aligned with that of KL divergence, making it a natural complement rather than a replacement. Extensive experiments on CIFAR-100, ImageNet, and COCO datasets, as well as various CNN and ViT teacher-student architecture combinations, demonstrate that our plug-and-play ranking loss consistently boosts the performance of multiple distillation baselines.
Yuchen Guan, Runxi Cheng, Chun Yuan 0003
ICML2