Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Rhys Sorenson-Graff

dblp:385/1538 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Audio and music processing · 50% Visualization and visual analytics · 50%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Visualization and visual analytics › information visualization
data physicalization
0.812024
Integrating Annotations for Sonifications and Physicalizations · IEEE VIS 2024
Audio and music processing
sonification
0.812024
Integrating Annotations for Sonifications and Physicalizations · IEEE VIS 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

exploratory study · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Integrating Annotations for Sonifications and Physicalizations
abstract
Annotations are a critical component of visualizations, helping viewers interpret the visual representation and highlighting critical data insights. Despite their significant role, we lack an understanding of how annotations can be incorporated into other data representations, such as physicalizations and sonifications. Given the emergent nature of these representations, sonifications, and physicalizations lack formalized conventions (e.g., design space, vocabulary) that can introduce challenges for audiences to interpret the intended data encoding. To address this challenge, this work focuses on how annotations can be more tightly integrated into the design process of creating sonifications and physicalizations. In an exploratory study with 13 designers, we explore how visualization annotation techniques can be adapted to sonic and physical modalities. Our work highlights how annotations for sonification and physicalizations are inseparable from their data encodings.
Rhys Sorenson-Graff, Sandra Bae, Jordan Wirfs-Brock
IEEE VIS1