Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Rashida Hakim

dblp:385/2284 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Theory of computation · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Algorithms and data structures · 61% Mathematical optimization · 30% Computational complexity · 9%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Algorithms and data structures
clustering
0.812024
The Fairness-Quality Tradeoff in Clustering · NeurIPS 2024
Algorithms and data structures › clustering › constrained clustering
fair clustering
0.812024
The Fairness-Quality Tradeoff in Clustering · NeurIPS 2024
Mathematical optimization › multi-objective optimization
pareto front computation
0.812024
The Fairness-Quality Tradeoff in Clustering · NeurIPS 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

polynomial-time algorithm · 0.8pareto front tracing · 0.8hardness reduction · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 The Fairness-Quality Tradeoff in Clustering
abstract
Fairness in clustering has been considered extensively in the past; however, the trade-off between the two objectives --- e.g., can we sacrifice just a little in the quality of the clustering to significantly increase fairness, or vice-versa? --- has rarely been addressed. We introduce novel algorithms for tracing the complete trade-off curve, or Pareto front, between quality and fairness in clustering problems; that is, computing all clusterings that are not dominated in both objectives by other clusterings. Unlike previous work that deals with specific objectives for quality and fairness, we deal with all objectives for fairness and quality in two general classes encompassing most of the special cases addressed in previous work. Our algorithm must take exponential time in the worst case as the Parero front itself can be exponential. Even when the Pareto front is polynomial, our algorithm may take exponential time, and we prove that this is inevitable unless P = NP. However, we also present a new polynomial-time algorithm for computing the entire Pareto front when the cluster centers are fixed, and for perhaps the most natural fairness objective: minimizing the sum, over all clusters, of the imbalance between the two groups in each cluster.
Rashida Hakim, Ana-Andreea Stoica, Christos H. Papadimitriou, Mihalis Yannakakis
NeurIPS1
2024 Swim till You Sink: Computing the Limit of a Game
Rashida Hakim, Jason Milionis, Christos H. Papadimitriou, Georgios Piliouras
SAGT1