Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Guangbei Zhang
dblp:385/3198
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0009-9296-9786ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2 · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Empirical software engineering · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Empirical software engineering › mining software repositories › developer communication analysis
developer forum analysis |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | An Empirical Study on Challenges for LLM Application Developers · ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. 2025 |
Empirical software engineering
mining software repositories |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | An Empirical Study on Challenges for LLM Application Developers · ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
taxonomy construction · 0.9manual analysis · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | SVA-ICL: Improving LLM-based software vulnerability assessment via in-context learning and information fusionabstractContext: Software vulnerability assessment (SVA) is critical for identifying, evaluating, and prioritizing security weaknesses in software applications. Objective: Despite the increasing application of large language models (LLMs) in various software engineering tasks, their effectiveness in SVA remains underexplored. Method: To address this gap, we introduce a novel approach SVA-ICL, which leverages in-context learning (ICL) to enhance LLM performance. Our approach involves the selection of high-quality demonstrations for ICL through information fusion, incorporating both source code and vulnerability descriptions. For source code, we consider semantic, lexical, and syntactic similarities, while for vulnerability descriptions, we focus on textual similarity. Based on the selected demonstrations, we construct context prompts and consider DeepSeek-V2 as the LLM for SVA-ICL. Results: We evaluate the effectiveness of SVA-ICL using a large-scale dataset comprising 12,071 C/C++ vulnerabilities. Experimental results demonstrate that SVA-ICL outperforms state-of-the-art SVA baselines in terms of Accuracy, F1-score, and MCC measures. Furthermore, ablation studies highlight the significance of component customization in SVA-ICL, such as the number of demonstrations, the demonstration ordering strategy, and the optimal fusion ratio of different modalities. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that leveraging ICL with information fusion can effectively improve the effectiveness of LLM-based SVA, warranting further research in this direction. Chaoyang Gao, Xiang Chen 0005, Guangbei Zhang |
Inf. Softw. Technol. | 3 |
| 2025 | An Empirical Study on Challenges for LLM Application DevelopersabstractIn recent years, large language models (LLMs) have seen rapid advancements, significantly impacting various fields such as computer vision, natural language processing, and software engineering. These LLMs, exemplified by OpenAI's ChatGPT, have revolutionized the way we approach language understanding and generation tasks. However, in contrast to traditional software development practices, LLM development introduces new challenges for AI developers in design, implementation, and deployment. These challenges span different areas (such as prompts, APIs, and plugins), requiring developers to navigate unique methodologies and considerations specific to LLM application development. Despite the profound influence of LLMs, to the best of our knowledge, these challenges have not been thoroughly investigated in previous empirical studies. To fill this gap, we present the first comprehensive study on understanding the challenges faced by LLM developers. Specifically, we crawl and analyze 29,057 relevant questions from a popular OpenAI developer forum. We first examine their popularity and difficulty. After manually analyzing 2,364 sampled questions, we construct a taxonomy of challenges faced by LLM developers. Based on this taxonomy, we summarize a set of findings and actionable implications for LLM-related stakeholders, including developers and providers (especially the OpenAI organization). Xiang Chen 0005, Chaoyang Gao, Chunyang Chen 0001, Guangbei Zhang, Yong Liu 0030 |
ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. | 4 |