Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Weize Wu

dblp:385/3721 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Language models and text generation · 56% Information extraction and text analysis · 28% Efficient and distributed learning · 8%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › in-context learning
demonstration retrieval
0.912025
ALLabel: Three-stage Active Learning for LLM-based Entity Recognition using Demonstration Retrieval · EMNLP 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
in-context learning
0.912025
ALLabel: Three-stage Active Learning for LLM-based Entity Recognition using Demonstration Retrieval · EMNLP 2025
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
named entity recognition
0.912025
ALLabel: Three-stage Active Learning for LLM-based Entity Recognition using Demonstration Retrieval · EMNLP 2025
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
active learning
0.312025
ALLabel: Three-stage Active Learning for LLM-based Entity Recognition using Demonstration Retrieval · EMNLP 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › learning with noisy labels
sample selection
0.312025
ALLabel: Three-stage Active Learning for LLM-based Entity Recognition using Demonstration Retrieval · EMNLP 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

in-context learning · 0.9demonstration retrieval · 0.9active learning · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 ALLabel: Three-stage Active Learning for LLM-based Entity Recognition using Demonstration Retrieval
abstract
Many contemporary data-driven research efforts in the natural sciences, such as chemistry and materials science, require large-scale, highperformance entity recognition from scientific datasets.Large language models (LLMs) have increasingly been adopted to solve the entity recognition task, with the same trend being observed on all-spectrum NLP tasks.The prevailing entity recognition LLMs rely on finetuned technology, yet the fine-tuning process often incurs significant cost.To achieve a best performance-cost trade-off, we propose ALLabel, a three-stage framework designed to select the most informative and representative samples in preparing the demonstrations for LLM modeling.The annotated examples are used to construct a ground-truth retrieval corpus for LLM in-context learning.By sequentially employing three distinct active learning strategies, ALLabel consistently outperforms all baselines under the same annotation budget across three specialized domain datasets.Experimental results also demonstrate that selectively annotating only 5%-10% of the dataset with ALLabel can achieve performance comparable to the method annotating the entire dataset.Further analyses and ablation studies verify the effectiveness and generalizability of our proposal.
Weize Wu, Qiji Zhou
EMNLP3
2025 Visual analysis of LLM-based entity resolution from scientific papers
abstract
This paper focuses on the visual analytics support for extracting domain-specific entities from extensive scientific literature, a task with inherent limitations using traditional named entity resolution methods. With the advent of large language models (LLMs) such as GPT-4, significant improvements over conventional machine learning approaches have been achieved due to LLM’s capability on entity resolution integrate abilities such as understanding multiple types of text. This research introduces a new visual analysis pipeline that integrates these advanced LLMs with versatile visualization and interaction designs to support batch entity resolution. Specifically, we focus on a specific material science field of Metal-Organic Frameworks (MOFs) and a large data collection namely CSD-MOFs. Through collaboration with domain experts in material science, we obtain well-labeled synthesis paragraphs. We propose human-in-the-loop refinement over the entity resolution process using visual analytics techniques, which allows domain experts to interactively integrate insights into LLM intelligence, including error analysis and interpretation of the retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) algorithm. Our evaluation through the case study of example selection for RAG demonstrates that this visual analysis approach effectively improves the accuracy of single-document entity resolution.
Weize Wu, Ruiming Li, Huobin Tan, Zipeng Liu
Vis. Informatics3