Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Alhanoof Alhunief

dblp:385/4413 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Information retrieval · 78% Knowledge graphs · 22%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Information retrieval › search engines › semantic search
ontology-based retrieval
0.912025
OntologyRAG-Q: Resource Development and Benchmarking for Retrieval-Augmented Question Answering in Qur'anic Tafsir · EMNLP 2025
Knowledge graphs › ontology
ontology construction
0.912025
OntologyRAG-Q: Resource Development and Benchmarking for Retrieval-Augmented Question Answering in Qur'anic Tafsir · EMNLP 2025
Information retrieval
question answering and dialogue systems
0.912025
OntologyRAG-Q: Resource Development and Benchmarking for Retrieval-Augmented Question Answering in Qur'anic Tafsir · EMNLP 2025
Information retrieval
retrieval-augmented generation
0.912025
OntologyRAG-Q: Resource Development and Benchmarking for Retrieval-Augmented Question Answering in Qur'anic Tafsir · EMNLP 2025
Information retrieval › retrieval models › neural retrieval
dense retrieval
0.312025
OntologyRAG-Q: Resource Development and Benchmarking for Retrieval-Augmented Question Answering in Qur'anic Tafsir · EMNLP 2025
Information retrieval
retrieval models
0.312025
OntologyRAG-Q: Resource Development and Benchmarking for Retrieval-Augmented Question Answering in Qur'anic Tafsir · EMNLP 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

large language model · 0.9embedding model · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 OntologyRAG-Q: Resource Development and Benchmarking for Retrieval-Augmented Question Answering in Qur'anic Tafsir
abstract
This paper introduces essential resources for Qur’anic studies: an annotated Tafsir ontology, a dataset of approximately 4,200 question-answer pairs, and a collection of 15 structured Tafsir books available in two formats. We present a comprehensive framework for handling sensitive Qur’anic Tafsir data that spans the entire pipeline from dataset construction through evaluation and error analysis. Our work establishes new benchmarks for retrieval and question-answering tasks on Qur’anic content, comparing performance across state-of-the-art embedding models and large language models (LLMs).We introduce OntologyRAG-Q, a novel retrieval-augmented generation approach featuring our custom Ayat-Ontology chunking method that segments Tafsir content at the verse level using ontology-driven structure. Benchmarking reveals strong performance across various LLMs, with GPT-4 achieving the highest results, followed closely by ALLaM. Expert evaluations show our system achieves 69.52% accuracy and 74.36% correctness overall, though multi-hop and context-dependent questions remain challenging. Our analysis demonstrates that answer position within documents significantly impacts retrieval performance, and among the evaluation metrics tested, BERT-recall and BERT-F1 correlate most strongly with expert assessments. The resources developed in this study are publicly available at https://github.com/sazani/OntologyRAG-Q.git.
Sadam Al-Azani, Maad Alowaifeer, Alhanoof Alhunief, Ahmed Abdelali
EMNLP3
2024 A Comprehensive Framework and Empirical Analysis for Evaluating Large Language Models in Arabic Dialect Identification
abstract
The widespread interest in large language models (LLMs) is rooted in their remarkable capacity to generate human-like and contextually relevant responses. However, the precision of LLMs within specific domains or intricate tasks, such as Arabic dialect identification, remains largely unexplored. This task presents a substantial challenge in Arabic natural language processing, given its language-dependent nature. This paper provides a framework for evaluating LLMs for Arabic dialect identification and conducts a comprehensive evaluation of LLMs, employing both tuning-free and fine-tuning-based learning paradigms. The evaluation encompasses GPT-3.5, chatGPT, GPT-4, and Google BARD for Arabic dialect identification under the tuning-free learning paradigm. Furthermore, it assesses the performance of GPT-3.5 along with AraBERT and MARBERT using the fine-tuning learning paradigm. In the tuning-free approach, GPT-4 achieves the most favorable results, reporting an F1MACof 45.60%. Under the fine-tuning learning paradigm, both AraBERT and MARBERT exhibit comparable performance (around 50% F 1MAC) to GPT-3.5, without incurring any financial costs, in contrast to the expenses associated with GPT-3.5.
Sadam Al-Azani, Nora Alturayeif, Haneen Abouelresh, Alhanoof Alhunief
IJCNN4