Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Gaurav Vipat

dblp:385/7025 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 1 · 1 since 2021Security and privacy · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
1 paper
Systems and software security · 67% Usable security · 33%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Services computing and microservices · 100%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Cloud and datacenter computing · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Systems and software security › vulnerability discovery
human factors in vulnerability discovery
0.812024
"Watching over the shoulder of a professional": Why Hackers Make Mistakes and How They Fix Them · SP 2024
Systems and software security
vulnerability discovery
0.812024
"Watching over the shoulder of a professional": Why Hackers Make Mistakes and How They Fix Them · SP 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

thematic analysis · 0.8screencast analysis · 0.8qualitative study · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Towards Performance Robustness for Microservices
Divyanshu Saxena, Gaurav Vipat, Jingbo Wang 0006, Isil Dillig, Sanjay Shakkottai, Aditya Akella
NSDI2
2024 "Watching over the shoulder of a professional": Why Hackers Make Mistakes and How They Fix Them
abstract
The complex and diverse nature of software systems necessitates a careful manual approach to unveil vulnerabilities, involving deep analysis, creative problem-solving, and specialized expertise. Like all complex tasks, it’s susceptible to mistakes stemming from cognitive limitations and behavioral factors that hinder optimal performance. Although there are significant research efforts focused on vulnerability discovery, little attention has been given to comprehending mistakes within the process. Understanding these mistakes could pave the way for better-designed education programs and automated tools, aiming to mitigate and prevent potential mistakes and enhance the efficiency of vulnerability research.In this paper, we leverage social media, specifically YouTube, to examine mistakes made by security content creators exploiting vulnerabilities in CTF-style challenges. Analyzing 30 screencasts from 11 hackers, we identified 124 distinct issues and investigated their types, underlying causes, and time investments. Additionally, we delved into the cognitive and behavioral aspects associated with these issues.
Irina Ford, Ananta Soneji, Faris Bugra Kokulu, Jayakrishna Vadayath, Zion Leonahenahe Basque, Gaurav Vipat, Adam Doupé, Ruoyu Wang 0001, Gail-Joon Ahn, Tiffany Bao, Yan Shoshitaishvili
SP6