Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Berfin Inal

dblp:385/7284 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Representation and self-supervised learning · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › representation geometry
latent space geometry
0.912025
Connecting Neural Models Latent Geometries with Relative Geodesic Representations · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
model stitching
0.912025
Connecting Neural Models Latent Geometries with Relative Geodesic Representations · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
representation geometry
0.912025
Connecting Neural Models Latent Geometries with Relative Geodesic Representations · NeurIPS 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

pullback metric · 0.9geodesic representation · 0.9differential geometry · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Connecting Neural Models Latent Geometries with Relative Geodesic Representations
abstract
Neural models learn representations of high-dimensional data on low-dimensional manifolds. Multiple factors, including stochasticities in the training process, model architectures, and additional inductive biases, may induce different representations, even when learning the same task on the same data. However, it has recently been shown that when a latent structure is shared between distinct latent spaces, relative distances between representations can be preserved, up to distortions. Building on this idea, we demonstrate that exploiting the differential-geometric structure of latent spaces of neural models, it is possible to capture *precisely* the transformations between representational spaces trained on similar data distributions. Specifically, we assume that distinct neural models parametrize approximately the same underlying manifold, and introduce a representation based on the *pullback metric* that captures the intrinsic structure of the latent space, while scaling efficiently to large models. We validate experimentally our method on model stitching and retrieval tasks, covering autoencoders and vision foundation discriminative models, across diverse architectures, datasets, pretraining schemes and modalities. Code is available at the following [link](https://github.com/marc0git/RelativeGeodesics).
Hanlin Yu, Berfin Inal, Georgios Arvanitidis, Søren Hauberg, Francesco Locatello, Marco Fumero
NeurIPS2