Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Lukas Retschmeier

dblp:385/7606 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0003-2805-9939ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021Theory of computation · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
2 papers
Privacy and data protection · 70% Cryptographic protocols and secure computation · 30%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Graph algorithms and graph theory · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Privacy and data protection
differential privacy
1.722025
Optimal Bounds for Private Minimum Spanning Trees via Input Perturbation · Proc. ACM Manag. Data 2025
Private Lossless Multiple Release · ICML 2025
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › fair exchange
gradual release
0.912025
Private Lossless Multiple Release · ICML 2025
Graph algorithms and graph theory › spanning tree
minimum spanning tree
0.912025
Optimal Bounds for Private Minimum Spanning Trees via Input Perturbation · Proc. ACM Manag. Data 2025
Privacy and data protection › randomization
input perturbation
0.312025
Optimal Bounds for Private Minimum Spanning Trees via Input Perturbation · Proc. ACM Manag. Data 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

private top-k selection · 1.7monte carlo · 1.7input perturbation · 1.7poisson mechanism · 0.9laplace mechanism · 0.9gaussian mechanism · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Revisiting a Successful Reduction Rule for Dominating Set
abstract
Given a graph \(G = (V,\!E)\) with \(n\) vertices and \(m\) edges, the Dominating Set problem asks for a set \(\mathcal{D} \subseteq V\) of minimal cardinality such that every vertex either is in \(D\) or adjacent to a member of \(D\). Although there is little hope for a kernelization algorithm on general graphs due to the W[2]-hardness of Dominating Set, data reduction rules are extensively used in practice.
Lukas Geis, Alexander Leonhardt, Johannes Meintrup, Ulrich Meyer 0001, Manuel Penschuck, Lukas Retschmeier
ALENEX6
2025 Private Lossless Multiple Release
abstract
Koufogiannis et al. (2016) showed a $\textit{gradual release}$ result for Laplace noise-based differentially private mechanisms: given an $\varepsilon$-DP release, a new release with privacy parameter $\varepsilon’ > \varepsilon$ can be computed such that the combined privacy loss of both releases is at most $\varepsilon’$ and the distribution of the latter is the same as a single release with parameter $\varepsilon’$. They also showed gradual release techniques for Gaussian noise, later also explored by Whitehouse et al. (2022). In this paper, we consider a more general $\textit{multiple release}$ setting in which analysts hold private releases with different privacy parameters corresponding to different access/trust levels. These releases are determined one by one, with privacy parameters in arbitrary order. A multiple release is $\textit{lossless}$ if having access to a subset $S$ of the releases has the same privacy guarantee as the least private release in $S$, and each release has the same distribution as a single release with the same privacy parameter. Our main result is that lossless multiple release is possible for a large class of additive noise mechanisms. For the Gaussian mechanism we give a simple method for lossless multiple release with a short, self-contained analysis that does not require knowledge of the mathematics of Brownian motion. We also present lossless multiple release for the Laplace and Poisson mechanisms. Finally, we consider how to efficiently do gradual release of sparse histograms, and present a mechanism with running time independent of the number of dimensions.
Joel Daniel Andersson, Lukas Retschmeier, Boel Nelson, Rasmus Pagh
ICML2
2025 Optimal Bounds for Private Minimum Spanning Trees via Input Perturbation
abstract
We study the problem of privately releasing an approximate minimum spanning tree (MST). Given a graph G = ( V , E , W ) where V is a set of n vertices, E is a set of m undirected edges, and W ∈ ℝ |E| is an edge-weight vector, our goal is to publish an approximate MST under edge-weight differential privacy, as introduced by Sealfon in PODS 2016, where V and E are considered public and the weight vector is private. Our neighboring relation is 𝓁 ∞ -distance on weights: for a sensitivity parameter Δ ∞ , graphs G = ( V , E , W ) and G' = ( V , E , W ') are neighboring if || W - W '|| ∞ ≤ Δ ∞ ). Existing private MST algorithms face a trade-off, sacrificing either computational efficiency or accuracy. We show that it is possible to get the best of both worlds: With a suitable random perturbation of the input that does not suffice to make the weight vector private, the result of any non-private MST algorithm will be private and achieves a state-of-the-art error guarantee. Furthermore, by establishing a connection to Private Top-k Selection [Steinke and Ullman, FOCS '17], we give the first privacy-utility trade-off lower bound for MST under approximate differential privacy, demonstrating that the error magnitude, ~O(n 3/2 ), is optimal up to logarithmic factors. That is, our approach matches the time complexity of any non-private MST algorithm and at the same time achieves optimal error. We complement our theoretical treatment with experiments that confirm the practicality of our approach.
Rasmus Pagh, Lukas Retschmeier, Hao Wu 0057, Hanwen Zhang 0003
Proc. ACM Manag. Data2