Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Defang Bo

dblp:385/7659 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0005-3830-723XORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021Security and privacy · 1 · 1 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
3 papers
Systems and software security · 96% Authentication and access control · 4%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Cloud and datacenter computing · 100%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Systems and software security
vulnerability discovery
1.922026
LifeFuzz: Lifecycle-Guided Fuzzing for Windows Driver Cross-Handler Vulnerabilities · EuroSys 2026
Understanding Resource Injection Vulnerabilities in Kubernetes Ecosystems · ASE 2025
Systems and software security › vulnerability discovery › fuzzing
driver fuzzing
1.012026
LifeFuzz: Lifecycle-Guided Fuzzing for Windows Driver Cross-Handler Vulnerabilities · EuroSys 2026
Systems and software security › vulnerability discovery
fuzzing
1.012026
LifeFuzz: Lifecycle-Guided Fuzzing for Windows Driver Cross-Handler Vulnerabilities · EuroSys 2026
Systems and software security
operating system security
1.012026
LifeFuzz: Lifecycle-Guided Fuzzing for Windows Driver Cross-Handler Vulnerabilities · EuroSys 2026
Cloud and datacenter computing
container orchestration
0.912025
Understanding Resource Injection Vulnerabilities in Kubernetes Ecosystems · ASE 2025
Cloud and datacenter computing › container orchestration
kubernetes security
0.912025
Understanding Resource Injection Vulnerabilities in Kubernetes Ecosystems · ASE 2025
Authentication and access control
access control
0.312025
Understanding Resource Injection Vulnerabilities in Kubernetes Ecosystems · ASE 2025
Systems and software security › operating system security
privilege escalation
0.312025
Understanding Resource Injection Vulnerabilities in Kubernetes Ecosystems · ASE 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

lifecycle-guided fuzzing · 1.0IOCTL sequence generation · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 LifeFuzz: Lifecycle-Guided Fuzzing for Windows Driver Cross-Handler Vulnerabilities
abstract
Third-party Windows drivers expose a critical attack surface. However, vulnerabilities that require cross-handler I/O Control (IOCTL) sequences remain hard to find, despite their prevalence, and often lead to privilege escalation. Static analysis suffers from high false positives, path explosion, and complex resource modeling. Meanwhile, dynamic fuzzers often exercise handlers in isolation or combine them randomly, leaving implicit state dependencies unchecked. To address the gap, we present LifeFuzz, a lifecycle-guided fuzzing framework that models global-variable lifecycles to construct dependency-respecting IOCTL sequences. Specifically, it identifies variable operations across handlers, preserves seeds that affect driver state, and then combines them into meaningful sequences. Consequently, LifeFuzz explores deep paths unreachable for existing fuzzers. We evaluate LifeFuzz on 26 Windows WDM drivers. It discovers 86 vulnerabilities, including 32 cross-handler cases, with six assigned CVE IDs. Moreover, it finds 357% more cross-handler vulnerabilities than msFuzz and achieves 19.2% higher average coverage. Overall, 37% of discovered vulnerabilities require cross-handler interactions, thereby validating lifecycle-aware, cross-handler fuzzing for driver security.
Chendong Yu, Yuekang Li, Yang Xiao 0011, Jie Lu 0009, Yeting Li, Defang Bo, Wei Huo 0005
EuroSys6
2025 Understanding Resource Injection Vulnerabilities in Kubernetes Ecosystems
abstract
Cloud-native technologies have revolutionized application development, with Kubernetes emerging as the de facto standard platform for containerization and orchestration. Kubernetes manages applications through API objects called resources, where users declare desired states via resource definitions that are processed by controllers to reconcile system discrepancies. However, this resource-based architecture introduces resource injection vulnerabilities, where controllers perform privileged operations using user-controllable fields without adequate validation. Attackers can exploit these weaknesses by injecting malicious content into resource fields to achieve unauthorized access and privilege escalation.In this paper, we conduct the first comprehensive study on 125 resource injection vulnerabilities from 8,306 Kubernetes-related vulnerabilities across common databases. For all studied vulnerabilities, we investigate their vulnerable fields, root causes, privileged operations, exploitation conditions, and fixing strategies. Our study reveals many interesting findings that can guide the detection and mitigation of resource injection vulnerabilities, as well as the development of more secure cloud-native applications.
Defang Bo, Jie Lu 0009, Feng Li 0045, Jingting Chen, Jinchen Wang, Chendong Yu, Yeting Li, Wei Huo 0005
ASE1
2024 File Hijacking Vulnerability: The Elephant in the Room
Chendong Yu, Yang Xiao 0011, Jie Lu 0009, Yuekang Li, Yeting Li, Lian Li 0002, Jian Wang 0067, Defang Bo, Wei Huo 0005
NDSS10