Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Lixun Ma
dblp:385/8235
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0004-4860-7861ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Security and privacy · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Software maintenance and evolution · 50% Program analysis · 50% | |
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Blockchain and cryptocurrency security · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Program analysis › program representation
abstract syntax tree analysis |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | I Know Who Clones Your Code: Interpretable Smart Contract Similarity Detection · IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput. 2025 |
Software maintenance and evolution
code clone detection |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | I Know Who Clones Your Code: Interpretable Smart Contract Similarity Detection · IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput. 2025 |
Blockchain and cryptocurrency security
smart contract |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | I Know Who Clones Your Code: Interpretable Smart Contract Similarity Detection · IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput. 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
cosine-wise diffusion · 1.7classifier hyperparameter search · 1.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Malicious Encrypted Traffic Detection with Transformer and Dual-Layer Meta-update Incremental Learning
Weiye Zhang, Haohan Tan, Lixun Ma, Zhenguang Liu, Qinming He |
ICIC (4) | 4 |
| 2025 | I Know Who Clones Your Code: Interpretable Smart Contract Similarity DetectionabstractWidespread reuse of open-source code in smart contract development boosts programming efficiency but significantly amplifies bug propagation across contracts, while dedicated methods for detecting similar smart contract functions remain very limited. Conventional abstract-syntax-tree (AST) based methods for smart contract similarity detection face challenges in handling intricate tree structures, which impedes detailed semantic comparison of code. Recent deep-learning based approaches tend to overlook code syntax and detection interpretability, resulting in suboptimal performance. To fill this research gap, we introduceSmartDetector, a novel approach for computing similarity between smart contract functions, explainable at the fine-grained statement level. Technically,SmartDetectordecomposes the AST of a smart contract function into a series of smaller statement trees, each reflecting a structural element of the source code. Then,SmartDetectoruses a classifier to compute the similarity score of two functions by comparing each pair of their statement trees. To address the infinite hyperparameter space of the classifier, we mathematically derive a cosine-wise diffusion process to efficiently search optimal hyperparameters. Extensive experiments conducted on three large real-world datasets demonstrate thatSmartDetectoroutperforms current state-of-the-art methods by an average improvement of 14.01% in F1-score, achieving an overall average F1-score of 95.88%. Zhenguang Liu, Lixun Ma, Zhongzheng Mu, Chengkun Wei, Yingying Jiao, Kui Ren 0001 |
IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput. | 2 |