Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Ofir Gaash
dblp:386/1945
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Optimization for machine learning · 100% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › stochastic optimization
asynchronous stochastic optimization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Faster Stochastic Optimization with Arbitrary Delays via Adaptive Asynchronous Mini-Batching · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
convergence analysis |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Convergence of Clipped SGD on Convex (L0, L1)-Smooth Functions · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
delayed gradient |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Faster Stochastic Optimization with Arbitrary Delays via Adaptive Asynchronous Mini-Batching · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
gradient clipping |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Convergence of Clipped SGD on Convex (L0, L1)-Smooth Functions · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
non-convex optimization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Convergence of Clipped SGD on Convex (L0, L1)-Smooth Functions · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
stochastic gradient descent |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Convergence of Clipped SGD on Convex (L0, L1)-Smooth Functions · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
stochastic optimization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Faster Stochastic Optimization with Arbitrary Delays via Adaptive Asynchronous Mini-Batching · ICML 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
stale gradient filtering · 0.9high-probability convergence · 0.9adaptive mini-batching · 0.9adaptive SGD · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Faster Stochastic Optimization with Arbitrary Delays via Adaptive Asynchronous Mini-BatchingabstractWe consider the problem of asynchronous stochastic optimization, where an optimization algorithm makes updates based on stale stochastic gradients of the objective that are subject to an arbitrary (possibly adversarial) sequence of delays. We present a procedure which, for any given $q \in (0,1]$, transforms any standard stochastic first-order method to an asynchronous method with convergence guarantee depending on the $q$-quantile delay of the sequence. This approach leads to convergence rates of the form $O(\tau_q/qT+\sigma/\sqrt{qT})$ for non-convex and $O(\tau_q^2/(q T)^2+\sigma/\sqrt{qT})$ for convex smooth problems, where $\tau_q$ is the $q$-quantile delay, generalizing and improving on existing results that depend on the average delay. We further show a method that automatically adapts to all quantiles simultaneously, without any prior knowledge of the delays, achieving convergence rates of the form $O(\inf_{q} \tau_q/qT+\sigma/\sqrt{qT})$ for non-convex and $O(\inf_{q} \tau_q^2/(q T)^2+\sigma/\sqrt{qT})$ for convex smooth problems. Our technique is based on asynchronous mini-batching with a careful batch-size selection and filtering of stale gradients. Amit Attia, Ofir Gaash, Tomer Koren |
ICML | 2 |
| 2025 | Convergence of Clipped SGD on Convex (L0, L1)-Smooth FunctionsabstractWe study stochastic gradient descent (SGD) with gradient clipping on convex functions under a generalized smoothness assumption called $(L_0,L_1)$-smoothness. Using gradient clipping, we establish a high probability convergence rate that matches the SGD rate in the $L$ smooth case up to polylogarithmic factors and additive terms. We also propose a variation of adaptive SGD with gradient clipping, which achieves the same guarantee. We perform empirical experiments to examine our theory and algorithmic choices. Ofir Gaash, Kfir Y. Levy, Yair Carmon |
NeurIPS | 1 |