Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Yixi Shen
dblp:386/2464
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Learning paradigms · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › continual learning
class-incremental learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Rebalancing Multi-Label Class-Incremental Learning · AAAI 2025 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › continual learning › class-incremental learning
multi-label class-incremental learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Rebalancing Multi-Label Class-Incremental Learning · AAAI 2025 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
class imbalance |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Rebalancing Multi-Label Class-Incremental Learning · AAAI 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
online relabeling · 0.9knowledge distillation · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Rebalancing Multi-Label Class-Incremental LearningabstractMulti-label class-incremental learning (MLCIL) is essential for real-world multi-label applications, allowing models to learn new labels while retaining previously learned knowledge continuously. However, recent MLCIL approaches can only achieve suboptimal performance due to the oversight of the positive-negative imbalance problem, which manifests at both the label and loss levels because of the task-level partial label issue. The imbalance at the label level arises from the substantial absence of negative labels, while the imbalance at the loss level stems from the asymmetric contributions of the positive and negative loss parts to the optimization. To address the issue above, we propose a Rebalance framework for both the Loss and Label levels (RebLL), which integrates two key modules: asymmetric knowledge distillation (AKD) and online relabeling (OR). AKD is proposed to rebalance at the loss level by emphasizing the negative label learning in classification loss and down-weighting the contribution of overconfident predictions in distillation loss. OR is designed for label rebalance, which restores the original class distribution in memory by online relabeling the missing classes. Our comprehensive experiments on the PASCAL VOC and MS-COCO datasets demonstrate that this rebalancing strategy significantly improves performance, achieving new state-of-the-art results even with a vanilla CNN backbone. Kaile Du, Fan Lyu, Yuyang Li 0005, Junzhou Xie, Yixi Shen, Fuyuan Hu, Guangcan Liu |
AAAI | 6 |