EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Xiazijian Zou
dblp:386/5262
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
0009-0001-3196-0587ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Software testing · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Software testing › test generation
constraint-based test generation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Towards More Complete Constraints for Deep Learning Library Testing via Complementary Set Guided Refinement · ISSTA 2024 |
Software testing › deep learning testing
deep learning library testing |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Towards More Complete Constraints for Deep Learning Library Testing via Complementary Set Guided Refinement · ISSTA 2024 |
Software testing
fuzzing |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Towards More Complete Constraints for Deep Learning Library Testing via Complementary Set Guided Refinement · ISSTA 2024 |
Software testing
test generation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Towards More Complete Constraints for Deep Learning Library Testing via Complementary Set Guided Refinement · ISSTA 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
genetic algorithm · 0.8fuzzing · 0.8constraint refinement · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Towards More Complete Constraints for Deep Learning Library Testing via Complementary Set Guided RefinementabstractDeep learning library is important in AI systems. Recently, many works have been proposed to ensure its reliability. They often model inputs of tensor operations as constraints to guide the generation of test cases. However, these constraints may narrow the search space, resulting in incomplete testing. This paper introduces a complementary set-guided refinement that can enhance the completeness of constraints. The basic idea is to see if the complementary set of constraints yields valid test cases. If so, the original constraint is incomplete and needs refinement. Based on this idea, we design an automatic constraint refinement tool, DeepConstr, which adopts a genetic algorithm to refine constraints for better completeness. We evaluated it on two DL libraries, PyTorch and TensorFlow. DeepConstr discovered 84 unknown bugs, out of which 72 were confirmed, with 51 fixed. Compared to state-of-the-art fuzzers, DeepConstr increased coverage for 43.44% of operators supported by NNSmith, and 59.16% of operators supported by NeuRI. Gwihwan Go, Chijin Zhou, Quan Zhang 0003, Xiazijian Zou, Heyuan Shi, Yu Jiang 0001 |
ISSTA | 4 |