Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Gabriel Dogadov

dblp:386/6153 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
3D vision · 100%
Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Geometric modeling and processing · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › 3D vision › 3d reconstruction
multi-view reconstruction
0.812024
Fitting Flats to Flats · CVPR 2024
Geometric modeling and processing
shape analysis
0.812024
Fitting Flats to Flats · CVPR 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

squared distance fields · 1.5principal component analysis · 1.5affine grassmannian · 1.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Fitting Flats to Flats
abstract
Affine subspaces of Euclidean spaces are also referred to as flats. A standard task in computer vision, or more generally in engineering and applied sciences, is fitting a flat to a set of points, which is commonly solved using the PCA. We generalize this technique to enable fitting a flat to a set of other flats, possibly of varying dimensions, based on representing the flats as squared distance fields. Compared to previous approaches such as Riemannian centers of mass in the manifold of affine Grassmannians, our approach is conceptually much simpler and computationally more efficient, yet offers desirable properties such as respecting symmetries and being equivariant to rigid transformations, leading to more intuitive and useful results in practice. We demonstrate these claims in a number of synthetic experiments and a multi-view reconstruction task of line-like objects.
Gabriel Dogadov, Ugo Paavo Finnendahl, Marc Alexa
CVPR1