The rapid development of diffusion models has significantly advanced AI-generated content (AIGC), particularly in Text-to-Image (T2I) and Text-to-Video (T2V) generation. Text-based video editing, leveraging these generative capabilities, has emerged as a promising field, enabling precise modifications to videos based on text prompts. Despite the proliferation of innovative video editing models, there is a conspicuous lack of comprehensive evaluation benchmarks that holistically assess these models’ performance across various dimensions. Existing evaluations are limited and inconsistent, typically summarizing overall performance with a single score, which obscures models’ effectiveness on individual editing tasks. To address this gap, we propose EditBoard, the first comprehensive evaluation benchmark for text-based video editing models. EditBoard encompasses nine automatic metrics across four dimensions, evaluating models on four task categories and introducing three new metrics to assess fidelity. This task-oriented benchmark facilitates objective evaluation by detailing model performance and providing insights into each model’s strengths and weaknesses. By open-sourcing EditBoard, we aim to standardize evaluation and advance the development of robust video editing models.

The rapidly developing Deep Learning (DL) techniques have been applied in software systems of various types. However, they can also pose new safety threats with potentially serious consequences, especially in safety-critical domains. DL libraries serve as the underlying foundation for DL systems, and bugs in them can have unpredictable impacts that directly affect the behaviors of DL systems. Previous research on fuzzing DL libraries still has limitations in generating tests corresponding to crucial testing scenarios and constructing test oracles. In this paper, we proposeMoCo, a novel fuzzing testing method for DL libraries via assembling code. The seed tests used byMoCoare code files that implement DL models, covering both model construction and training in the most common real-world application scenarios for DL libraries.MoCofirst disassembles the seed code files to extract templates and code blocks, then applies code block mutation operators (e.g., API replacement, random generation, and boundary checking) to generate new code blocks that fit the template. To ensure the correctness of the code block mutation, we employ the Large Language Model to parse the official documents of DL libraries for information about the parameters and the constraints between them. By inserting context-appropriate code blocks into the template,MoCocan generate a tree of code files with intergenerational relations. According to the derivation relations in this tree, we construct the test oracle based on the execution state consistency and the calculation result consistency. Since the granularity of code assembly is controlled rather than randomly divergent, we can quickly pinpoint the lines of code where the bugs are located and the corresponding triggering conditions. We conduct a comprehensive experiment to evaluate the efficiency and effectiveness ofMoCousing three widely-used DL libraries (i.e., TensorFlow, PyTorch, and Jittor). During the experiments,MoCodetects 77 new bugs of four types in three DL libraries, where 55 bugs have been confirmed, and 39 bugs have been fixed by developers. The experimental results demonstrate thatMoCocan generate high-quality tests that cover crucial testing scenarios and detect different types of bugs, which helps developers improve the reliability of DL libraries.