EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Amirmohammad Izadi
dblp:387/4188
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Vision and language · 93% Image recognition and object detection · 7% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › Vision and language › compositionality
binding problem |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Visual Structures Help Visual Reasoning: Addressing the Binding Problem in LVLMs · NeurIPS 2025 |
Computer vision › Vision and language › vision-language model
multimodal large language model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Visual Structures Help Visual Reasoning: Addressing the Binding Problem in LVLMs · NeurIPS 2025 |
Computer vision › Vision and language
visual grounding |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Visual Structures Help Visual Reasoning: Addressing the Binding Problem in LVLMs · NeurIPS 2025 |
Computer vision › Vision and language
visual reasoning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Visual Structures Help Visual Reasoning: Addressing the Binding Problem in LVLMs · NeurIPS 2025 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
visual search |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Visual Structures Help Visual Reasoning: Addressing the Binding Problem in LVLMs · NeurIPS 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
visual input structuring · 0.9chain-of-thought prompting · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Visual Structures Help Visual Reasoning: Addressing the Binding Problem in LVLMsabstractDespite progress in Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs), their capacity for visual reasoning is often limited by the binding problem: the failure to reliably associate perceptual features with their correct visual referents. This limitation underlies persistent errors in tasks such as counting, visual search, scene description, and spatial relationship understanding. A key factor is that current LVLMs process visual features largely in parallel, lacking mechanisms for spatially grounded, serial attention.
This paper introduces Visual Input Structure for Enhanced Reasoning (VISER), a simple, effective method that augments visual inputs with low-level spatial structures and pairs them with a textual prompt that encourages sequential, spatially-aware parsing. We empirically demonstrate substantial performance improvements across core visual reasoning tasks, using only a single-query inference. Specifically, VISER improves GPT-4o performance on visual search, counting, and spatial relationship tasks by 25.0%, 26.8%, and 9.5%, respectively, and reduces edit distance error in scene description by 0.32 on 2D datasets.
Furthermore, we find that the visual modification is essential for these gains; purely textual strategies, including Chain-of-Thought prompting, are insufficient and can even degrade performance. VISER underscores the importance of visual input design over purely linguistically based reasoning strategies and suggests that visual structuring is a powerful and general approach for enhancing compositional and spatial reasoning in LVLMs. Amirmohammad Izadi, Mohammadali Banayeeanzade, Fatemeh Askari, Ali Rahimiakbar, Mohammad Mahdi Vahedi, Hosein Hasani, Mahdieh Soleymani Baghshah |
NeurIPS | 1 |