Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Nina Zukowska

dblp:387/5069 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Efficient and distributed learning · 56% Representation and self-supervised learning · 28% Deep learning architectures and training · 17%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Program analysis · 67% Requirements engineering and software design · 33%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Machine learning and data management · 100%

Topics — the 9 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model compression
0.912025
Exploring Representations and Interventions in Time Series Foundation Models · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression
pruning
0.912025
Exploring Representations and Interventions in Time Series Foundation Models · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
representation analysis
0.912025
Exploring Representations and Interventions in Time Series Foundation Models · ICML 2025
Program analysis
data flow analysis
0.912025
APEX-DAG: Library and Language independent Pipeline EXtraction · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2025
Requirements engineering and software design › software architecture › software architecture analysis
software architecture recovery
0.912025
APEX-DAG: Library and Language independent Pipeline EXtraction · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2025
Program analysis
static analysis
0.912025
APEX-DAG: Library and Language independent Pipeline EXtraction · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2025
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
foundation model
0.312025
Exploring Representations and Interventions in Time Series Foundation Models · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › foundation model
time series foundation model
0.312025
Exploring Representations and Interventions in Time Series Foundation Models · ICML 2025
Machine learning and data management
machine learning pipeline
0.312025
APEX-DAG: Library and Language independent Pipeline EXtraction · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

static code analysis · 1.7graph attention network · 1.7representational similarity analysis · 0.9concept steering · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Exploring Representations and Interventions in Time Series Foundation Models
abstract
Time series foundation models (TSFMs) promise to be powerful tools for a wide range of applications. However, their internal representations and learned concepts are still not well understood. In this study, we investigate the structure and redundancy of representations across various TSFMs, examining the self-similarity of model layers within and across different model sizes. This analysis reveals block-like redundancy in the representations, which can be utilized for informed pruning to improve inference speed and efficiency. We also explore the concepts learned by these models, such as periodicity and trends. We demonstrate how conceptual priors can be derived from TSFM representations and leveraged to steer its outputs toward concept-informed predictions. Our work bridges representational analysis from language and vision models to TSFMs, offering new methods for building more computationally efficient and transparent TSFMs.
Michal Wilinski, Mononito Goswami, Willa Potosnak, Nina Zukowska, Artur Dubrawski
ICML4
2025 APEX-DAG: Library and Language independent Pipeline EXtraction
abstract
Modern data-driven systems often rely on complex pipelines to process and transform data for downstream machine learning (ML) tasks. Extracting these pipelines and understanding their structure is critical for ensuring transparency, performance optimization, and maintainability, especially in large-scale projects. In this work, we introduce a novel system, APEX-DAG ( A utomating P ipeline EX traction with D ataflow, Static Code A nalysis, and G raph Attention Networks), which automates the extraction of data pipelines from computational notebooks or scripts. Unlike execution-based methods, APEX-DAG leverages static code analysis to identify the dataflow, transformations, and dependencies within ML workflows without executing the code or the need to alter the code. Further, after an initial training phase, our system can identify pipelines that built with previously unseen libraries.
Sebastian Eggers, Nina Zukowska, Ziawasch Abedjan
Proc. VLDB Endow.2