Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Nina Zukowska
dblp:387/5069
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Efficient and distributed learning · 56% Representation and self-supervised learning · 28% Deep learning architectures and training · 17% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Program analysis · 67% Requirements engineering and software design · 33% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Machine learning and data management · 100% |
Topics — the 9 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model compression |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Exploring Representations and Interventions in Time Series Foundation Models · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression
pruning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Exploring Representations and Interventions in Time Series Foundation Models · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
representation analysis |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Exploring Representations and Interventions in Time Series Foundation Models · ICML 2025 |
Program analysis
data flow analysis |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | APEX-DAG: Library and Language independent Pipeline EXtraction · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2025 |
Requirements engineering and software design › software architecture › software architecture analysis
software architecture recovery |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | APEX-DAG: Library and Language independent Pipeline EXtraction · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2025 |
Program analysis
static analysis |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | APEX-DAG: Library and Language independent Pipeline EXtraction · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2025 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
foundation model |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Exploring Representations and Interventions in Time Series Foundation Models · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › foundation model
time series foundation model |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Exploring Representations and Interventions in Time Series Foundation Models · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning and data management
machine learning pipeline |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | APEX-DAG: Library and Language independent Pipeline EXtraction · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
static code analysis · 1.7graph attention network · 1.7representational similarity analysis · 0.9concept steering · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Exploring Representations and Interventions in Time Series Foundation ModelsabstractTime series foundation models (TSFMs) promise to be powerful tools for a wide range of applications. However, their internal representations and learned concepts are still not well understood. In this study, we investigate the structure and redundancy of representations across various TSFMs, examining the self-similarity of model layers within and across different model sizes. This analysis reveals block-like redundancy in the representations, which can be utilized for informed pruning to improve inference speed and efficiency. We also explore the concepts learned by these models, such as periodicity and trends. We demonstrate how conceptual priors can be derived from TSFM representations and leveraged to steer its outputs toward concept-informed predictions. Our work bridges representational analysis from language and vision models to TSFMs, offering new methods for building more computationally efficient and transparent TSFMs. Michal Wilinski, Mononito Goswami, Willa Potosnak, Nina Zukowska, Artur Dubrawski |
ICML | 4 |
| 2025 | APEX-DAG: Library and Language independent Pipeline EXtractionabstractModern data-driven systems often rely on complex pipelines to process and transform data for downstream machine learning (ML) tasks. Extracting these pipelines and understanding their structure is critical for ensuring transparency, performance optimization, and maintainability, especially in large-scale projects. In this work, we introduce a novel system, APEX-DAG ( A utomating P ipeline EX traction with D ataflow, Static Code A nalysis, and G raph Attention Networks), which automates the extraction of data pipelines from computational notebooks or scripts. Unlike execution-based methods, APEX-DAG leverages static code analysis to identify the dataflow, transformations, and dependencies within ML workflows without executing the code or the need to alter the code. Further, after an initial training phase, our system can identify pipelines that built with previously unseen libraries. Sebastian Eggers, Nina Zukowska, Ziawasch Abedjan |
Proc. VLDB Endow. | 2 |