Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.

Sabeen Fatima

dblp:388/6351 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Empirical software engineering · 100%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Information retrieval · 50% Data mining · 50%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Empirical software engineering › mining software repositories › app store mining
app review analysis
0.812024
A Data-driven Approach for Mining Software Features based on Similar App Descriptions and User Reviews Analysis · ASE 2024
Empirical software engineering › mining software repositories
app store mining
0.812024
A Data-driven Approach for Mining Software Features based on Similar App Descriptions and User Reviews Analysis · ASE 2024
Empirical software engineering
mining software repositories
0.812024
A Data-driven Approach for Mining Software Features based on Similar App Descriptions and User Reviews Analysis · ASE 2024
Information retrieval
text analysis
0.212024
A Data-driven Approach for Mining Software Features based on Similar App Descriptions and User Reviews Analysis · ASE 2024
Data mining › text mining
topic modeling
0.212024
A Data-driven Approach for Mining Software Features based on Similar App Descriptions and User Reviews Analysis · ASE 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

topic modeling · 1.5non-negative matrix factorization · 1.5named entity recognition · 1.5Sentence-BERT · 1.5BERT · 1.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 A Data-driven Approach for Mining Software Features based on Similar App Descriptions and User Reviews Analysis
abstract
Mobile app development necessitates extracting domain-specific, essential, and innovative features that align with user needs and market trends. Determining which features provide a competitive advantage is a complex task, often managed manually by product managers. This study addresses the challenge of automating feature mining and recommendation by identifying similar apps based on user-provided descriptions. The proposed approach integrates Named Entity Recognition (NER) for feature extraction from mined Google Play app data with BERT (Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers) and Topic Modeling to find comparable apps. Our top-performing model, which uses Non-negative Matrix Factorization (NMF) for Topic Modeling with Sentence-BERT (SBERT) embeddings, achieves an F1 score of 87.38%.
Khubaib Amjad Alam, Ramsha Ali, Zyena Kamran, Sabeen Fatima, Irum Inayat
ASE4