Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Sina Rostami

dblp:389/2326 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
0009-0006-6883-9939ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer networks
1 paper
Internet architecture and protocols · 100%
Network and information security
1 paper
Network security · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Internet architecture and protocols › network security
router security
0.812024
Poster: An Investigation into Internet-facing Router Services · IMC 2024
Network security
network measurement
0.812024
Poster: An Investigation into Internet-facing Router Services · IMC 2024
Internet architecture and protocols
internet infrastructure
0.212024
Poster: An Investigation into Internet-facing Router Services · IMC 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

internet-wide scanning · 1.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Poster: An Investigation into Internet-facing Router Services
abstract
Routers are the core building block of the Internet infrastructure. Maintaining a secure router deployment is critical for protecting networks and providing uninterrupted, smooth operation. In this work, we take a first step toward analyzing routers' security on the Internet. We focus on the potential attack surface for routers, i.e., publicly exposed services. Specifically, we investigate what services are commonly running on known router IPv4 addresses. While exposed services may not pose an immediate risk, they do highlight failure to follow best practices, e.g., strict access control lists. We found that more than 40% of known router IPv4 addresses have at least one public-facing service. We also highlight the lack of consistency in applying network-wide security policies.
Sina Rostami, Tiago Heinrich, Taha Albakour
IMC1