Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Xusen Hei

dblp:389/2648 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
4since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0009-3148-139XORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Language models and text generation · 41% Vision and language · 26% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 22%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Program analysis · 50% Debugging and program repair · 50%
Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Geometric modeling and processing · 100%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Computing education · 100%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Geometric modeling and processing
computer-aided design
1.012026
CADMate: Generating CAD Assembly Plan with Geometric Chain-of-Thought and Spatial Physical Rewards · ACL (1) 2026
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
retrieval-augmented generation
0.912025
ExpStar: Towards Automatic Commentary Generation for Multi-discipline Scientific Experiments · ACM Multimedia 2025
Program analysis
static analysis
0.912025
CADReview: Automatically Reviewing CAD Programs with Error Detection and Correction · ACL (1) 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text generation › text response generation
feedback generation
0.812024
Learning to Correction: Explainable Feedback Generation for Visual Commonsense Reasoning Distractor · ACM Multimedia 2024
Computer vision › Vision and language › visual reasoning
visual commonsense reasoning
0.812024
Learning to Correction: Explainable Feedback Generation for Visual Commonsense Reasoning Distractor · ACM Multimedia 2024
Computer vision › Vision and language
multimodal reasoning
0.312026
CADMate: Generating CAD Assembly Plan with Geometric Chain-of-Thought and Spatial Physical Rewards · ACL (1) 2026
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
explainable AI
0.212024
Learning to Correction: Explainable Feedback Generation for Visual Commonsense Reasoning Distractor · ACM Multimedia 2024
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability
0.212024
Learning to Correction: Explainable Feedback Generation for Visual Commonsense Reasoning Distractor · ACM Multimedia 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

large multimodal model · 2.5spatial physical rewards · 2.0chain-of-thought · 2.0retrieval augmentation · 1.7program review · 0.9large language model · 0.9instruction tuning · 0.8expert prompt · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 CADMate: Generating CAD Assembly Plan with Geometric Chain-of-Thought and Spatial Physical Rewards
abstract
Jiali Chen, DingBa Fu, Xusen Hei, Yuhang Liu, Yiyang Chen, Jiayuan Xie, Wenqi Fan, Yi Cai. Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2026.
DingBa Fu, Xusen Hei, Jiayuan Xie, Wenqi Fan, Yi Cai 0001
ACL (1)3
2025 CADReview: Automatically Reviewing CAD Programs with Error Detection and Correction
abstract
Jiali Chen, Xusen Hei, HongFei Liu, Yuancheng Wei, Zikun Deng, Jiayuan Xie, Yi Cai, Li Qing. Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2025.
Xusen Hei, Yuancheng Wei, Zikun Deng, Jiayuan Xie, Yi Cai 0001, Qing Li 0001
ACL (1)2
2025 ExpStar: Towards Automatic Commentary Generation for Multi-discipline Scientific Experiments
abstract
Experiment commentary is crucial in describing the experimental procedures, delving into underlying scientific principles, and incorporating content-related safety guidelines. In practice, human teachers rely heavily on subject-specific expertise and invest significant time preparing such commentary. To address this challenge, we introduce the task of automatic commentary generation across multi-discipline scientific experiments. Current LMMs' ability to generate fine-grained and insightful experiment commentary remains largely under-explored. In this paper, we make the following contributions: (i) We construct ExpInstruct, the first dataset tailored for experiment commentary generation, featuring over 7 K step-level commentaries across 21 scientific subjects from 3 core disciplines. (ii) We propose ExpStar, an automatic experiment commentary generation model that leverages a retrieval-augmented mechanism to adaptively access, evaluate, and utilize external knowledge. (iii) Extensive experiments show that our ExpStar substantially outperforms 14 leading LMMs, which highlights the superiority of our dataset and model. We believe that ExpStar holds great potential for advancing AI-assisted scientific experiment instruction.
Yujie Jia, Jianpeng Chen, Xusen Hei, Jiayuan Xie, Yi Cai 0001, Qing Li 0001
ACM Multimedia6
2024 Learning to Correction: Explainable Feedback Generation for Visual Commonsense Reasoning Distractor
abstract
Large multimodal models (LMMs) have shown remarkable performance in the visual commonsense reasoning (VCR) task, which aims to answer a multiple-choice question based on visual commonsense within an image. However, the ability of LMMs to correct potential visual commonsense errors in the distractor upon their occurrence is yet under-explored. Drawing inspiration from how a human teacher crafts challenging distractors to test students' comprehension of the concepts or skills and assists them in identifying and correcting errors toward the answer, we are the pioneering research for LMMs to simulate this error correction process. To this end, we employ GPT-4 as a ''teacher'' to collect the explainable feedback dataset VCR-DF for error correction, which serves as a benchmark to evaluate the ability of LMMs to identify misconceptions and clarify reasons behind the error in VCR distractors toward final answers. In addition, we propose an LMM-based Pedagogical Expert Instructed Feedback Generation (PEIFG) model to incorporate the learnable expert prompts and multimodal instruction as guidance for feedback generation. Experimental results show that our PEIFG significantly outperforms existing LMMs. We believe that our benchmark provides a new direction for evaluating the capabilities of LMMs.
Xusen Hei, Yuqi Xue, Yuancheng Wei, Jiayuan Xie, Yi Cai 0001, Qing Li 0001
ACM Multimedia2