Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Christa S. Robison

dblp:389/3967 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Robot navigation and mapping · 54% Representation and self-supervised learning · 18% Video understanding and tracking · 18%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Mathematical optimization · 100%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
SLAM
1.722025
Submodular Optimization for Keyframe Selection & Usage in SLAM · ICRA 2025
LiDAR Inertial Odometry and Mapping Using Learned Registration-Relevant Features · ICRA 2025
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
feature extraction
0.912025
LiDAR Inertial Odometry and Mapping Using Learned Registration-Relevant Features · ICRA 2025
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking › video summarization
keyframe selection
0.912025
Submodular Optimization for Keyframe Selection & Usage in SLAM · ICRA 2025
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › localization › odometry
LiDAR odometry
0.912025
LiDAR Inertial Odometry and Mapping Using Learned Registration-Relevant Features · ICRA 2025
Computer vision › 3D vision
point cloud processing
0.312025
LiDAR Inertial Odometry and Mapping Using Learned Registration-Relevant Features · ICRA 2025
Computer vision › 3D vision
point cloud registration
0.312025
LiDAR Inertial Odometry and Mapping Using Learned Registration-Relevant Features · ICRA 2025
Mathematical optimization
submodular optimization
0.312025
Submodular Optimization for Keyframe Selection & Usage in SLAM · ICRA 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

submodular optimization · 1.7learned feature extraction · 0.9LiDAR-inertial odometry · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 LiDAR Inertial Odometry and Mapping Using Learned Registration-Relevant Features
abstract
SLAM is an important capability for many autonomous systems, and modern LiDAR-based methods offer promising performance. However, for long duration missions, existing works that either take directly the full pointclouds or extracted features face key tradeoffs in accuracy and computational efficiency (e.g., memory consumption). To address these issues, this paper presents DFLIOM with several key innovations. Unlike previous methods that rely on handcrafted heuristics and hand-tuned parameters for feature extraction, we propose a learning-based approach that select points relevant to LiDAR SLAM pointcloud registration. Furthermore, we extend our prior work DLIOM with the learned feature extractor and observe our method enables similar or even better localization performance using only about 20% of the points in the dense point clouds. We demonstrate that DFLIOM performs well on multiple public benchmarks, achieving a 2.4% decrease in localization error and 57.5% decrease in localization error and 57.5 % decrease in memory usage compared to state-of-the-art methods (DLIOM). Although extracting features with the proposed network requires extra time, it is offset by the faster processing time downstream, thus maintaining real-time performance using 20 Hz LiDAR on our hardware setup. The effectiveness of our learning-based feature extraction module is further demonstrated through comparison with several handcrafted feature extractors.
Jeff Pflueger, Leonard Jung, David Thorne, Philip R. Osteen, Christa S. Robison, Brett Thomas Lopez, Michael Everett
ICRA6
2025 Submodular Optimization for Keyframe Selection & Usage in SLAM
abstract
Keyframes are LiDAR scans saved for future reference in Simultaneous Localization And Mapping (SLAM), but despite their central importance most algorithms leave choices of which scans to save and how to use them to wasteful heuristics. This work proposes two novel keyframe selection strategies for localization and map summarization, as well as a novel approach to submap generation which selects keyframes that best constrain localization. Our results show that online keyframe selection and submap generation reduce the number of saved keyframes and improve per scan computation time without compromising localization performance. We also present a map summarization feature for quickly capturing environments under strict map size constraints.
David Thorne, Nathan Chan, Yanlong Ma, Christa S. Robison, Philip R. Osteen, Brett Thomas Lopez
ICRA4