Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
George Giapitzakis
dblp:389/6274
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
4since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021Security and privacy · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Deep learning architectures and training · 53% Learning theory · 47% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Computational complexity · 100% |
Topics — the 8 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computational complexity › learning theory › statistical query learning
statistical query complexity |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | On the Statistical Query Complexity of Learning Semiautomata: a Random Walk Approach · COLT 2026 |
Computational complexity › learning theory
statistical query learning |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | On the Statistical Query Complexity of Learning Semiautomata: a Random Walk Approach · COLT 2026 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
neural network expressivity |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Learning to Add, Multiply, and Execute Algorithmic Instructions Exactly with Neural Networks · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › neural network theory › neural network kernels
neural tangent kernel |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Learning to Add, Multiply, and Execute Algorithmic Instructions Exactly with Neural Networks · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
training dynamics |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Learning to Add, Multiply, and Execute Algorithmic Instructions Exactly with Neural Networks · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
transformer |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Positional Attention: Expressivity and Learnability of Algorithmic Computation · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
PAC learning |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | On the Statistical Query Complexity of Learning Semiautomata: a Random Walk Approach · COLT 2026 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › PAC learning
uniform distribution |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | On the Statistical Query Complexity of Learning Semiautomata: a Random Walk Approach · COLT 2026 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
spectral gap bounds · 2.0representation theory of symmetric group · 2.0random walk · 2.0fourier analysis · 2.0sample complexity analysis · 0.9positional encoding · 0.9neural tangent kernel · 0.9ensemble methods · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | On the Statistical Query Complexity of Learning Semiautomata: a Random Walk ApproachabstractSemiautomata form a rich class of sequence-processing algorithms with applications in natural language processing, robotics, computational biology, and data mining. We establish the first Statistical Query hardness result for semiautomata under the uniform distribution over input words and initial states. We show that Statistical Query hardness can be established when both the alphabet size and input length are polynomial in the number of states. Unlike the case of deterministic finite automata, where hardness typically arises through the hardness of the language they recognize (e.g., parity), our result is derived solely from the internal state-transition structure of semiautomata. Our analysis reduces the task of distinguishing the final states of two semiautomata to studying the behavior of a random walk on the group $S_{N} \times S_{N}$. By applying tools from Fourier analysis and the representation theory of the symmetric group, we obtain tight spectral gap bounds, demonstrating that after a polynomial number of steps in the number of states, distinct semiautomata become nearly uncorrelated, yielding the desired hardness result. George Giapitzakis, Kimon Fountoulakis, Eshaan Nichani, Jason D. Lee |
COLT | 1 |
| 2026 | On the Practicality of Quantum Sieving Algorithms for the Shortest Vector Problem
João F. Doriguello, George Giapitzakis, Alessandro Luongo, Aditya Morolia |
PQCrypto (1) | 2 |
| 2025 | Positional Attention: Expressivity and Learnability of Algorithmic ComputationabstractThere is a growing interest in the ability of neural networks to execute algorithmic tasks (e.g., arithmetic, summary statistics, and sorting). The goal of this work is to better understand the role of attention in Transformers for algorithmic execution. Its importance for algorithmic execution has been studied theoretically and empirically using parallel computational models. Notably, many parallel algorithms communicate between processors solely using positional information. Inspired by this observation, we investigate how Transformers can execute algorithms using positional attention, where attention weights depend exclusively on positional encodings. We prove that Transformers with positional attention (positional Transformers) maintain the same expressivity of parallel computational models, incurring a logarithmic depth cost relative to the input length. We analyze their in-distribution learnability and explore how parameter norms in positional attention affect sample complexity. Our results show that positional Transformers introduce a learning trade-off: while they exhibit better theoretical dependence on parameter norms, certain tasks may require more layers, which can, in turn, increase sample complexity. Finally, we empirically explore the out-of-distribution performance of positional Transformers and find that they perform well in tasks where their underlying algorithmic solution relies on positional information. Artur Back de Luca, George Giapitzakis, Shenghao Yang 0002, Petar Velickovic, Kimon Fountoulakis |
ICML | 2 |
| 2025 | Learning to Add, Multiply, and Execute Algorithmic Instructions Exactly with Neural NetworksabstractNeural networks are known for their ability to approximate smooth functions, yet they fail to generalize perfectly to unseen inputs when trained on discrete operations. Such operations lie at the heart of algorithmic tasks such as arithmetic, which is often used as a test bed for algorithmic execution in neural networks. In this work, we ask: can neural networks learn to execute binary-encoded algorithmic instructions exactly? We use the Neural Tangent Kernel (NTK) framework to study the training dynamics of two-layer fully connected networks in the infinite-width limit and show how a sufficiently large ensemble of such models can be trained to execute exactly, with high probability, four fundamental tasks: binary permutations, binary addition, binary multiplication, and Subtract and Branch if Negative (SBN) instructions. Since SBN is Turing-complete, our framework extends to computable functions. We show how this can be efficiently achieved using only logarithmically many training data. Our approach relies on two techniques: structuring the training data to isolate bit-level rules, and controlling correlations in the NTK regime to align model predictions with the target algorithmic executions. Artur Back de Luca, George Giapitzakis, Kimon Fountoulakis |
NeurIPS | 2 |