Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Abir Harrasse

dblp:389/8695 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Trustworthy machine learning · 73% Information extraction and text analysis · 10% Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 10%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Data models and query languages · 100%

Topics — the 11 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability
1.722025
Activation Space Interventions Can Be Transferred Between Large Language Models · ICML 2025
TinySQL: A Progressive Text-to-SQL Dataset for Mechanistic Interpretability Research · EMNLP 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › representation engineering
activation editing
0.912025
Activation Space Interventions Can Be Transferred Between Large Language Models · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › backdoor defense
backdoor removal
0.912025
Activation Space Interventions Can Be Transferred Between Large Language Models · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › mechanistic interpretability
circuit analysis
0.912025
TinySQL: A Progressive Text-to-SQL Dataset for Mechanistic Interpretability Research · EMNLP 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
mechanistic interpretability
0.912025
TinySQL: A Progressive Text-to-SQL Dataset for Mechanistic Interpretability Research · EMNLP 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness
0.912025
Activation Space Interventions Can Be Transferred Between Large Language Models · ICML 2025
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › semantic parsing
text-to-SQL
0.912025
TinySQL: A Progressive Text-to-SQL Dataset for Mechanistic Interpretability Research · EMNLP 2025
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
universal representation
0.912025
Activation Space Interventions Can Be Transferred Between Large Language Models · ICML 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
alignment
0.312025
Activation Space Interventions Can Be Transferred Between Large Language Models · ICML 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model
0.312025
Activation Space Interventions Can Be Transferred Between Large Language Models · ICML 2025
Data models and query languages
SQL
0.312025
TinySQL: A Progressive Text-to-SQL Dataset for Mechanistic Interpretability Research · EMNLP 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

sparse autoencoder · 1.7logit lens · 1.7edge attribution patching · 1.7steering vectors · 0.9fine-tuning · 0.9autoencoder mapping · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 TinySQL: A Progressive Text-to-SQL Dataset for Mechanistic Interpretability Research
abstract
Mechanistic interpretability research faces a gap between analyzing simple circuits in toy tasks and discovering features in large models.To bridge this gap, we propose text-to-SQL generation as an ideal task to study, as it combines the formal structure of toy tasks with realworld complexity.We introduce TinySQL, a synthetic dataset, progressing from basic to advanced SQL operations, and train models ranging from 33M to 1B parameters to establish a comprehensive testbed for interpretability.We apply multiple complementary interpretability techniques, including Edge Attribution Patching and Sparse Autoencoders, to identify minimal circuits and components supporting SQL generation.We compare circuits for different SQL subskills, evaluating their minimality, reliability, and identifiability.Finally, we conduct a layerwise logit lens analysis to reveal how models compose SQL queries across layers: from intent recognition to schema resolution to structured generation.Our work provides a robust framework for probing and comparing interpretability methods in a structured, progressively complex setting.
Abir Harrasse, Philip Quirke, Clement Neo, Dhruv Nathawani, Luke Marks, Amir Abdullah
EMNLP1
2025 Activation Space Interventions Can Be Transferred Between Large Language Models
abstract
The study of representation universality in AI models reveals growing convergence across domains, modalities, and architectures. However, the practical applications of representation universality remain largely unexplored. We bridge this gap by demonstrating that safety interventions can be transferred between models through learned mappings of their shared activation spaces. We demonstrate this approach on two well-established AI safety tasks: backdoor removal and refusal of harmful prompts, showing successful transfer of steering vectors that alter the models’ outputs in a predictable way. Additionally, we propose a new task, corrupted capabilities, where models are fine-tuned to embed knowledge tied to a backdoor. This tests their ability to separate useful skills from backdoors, reflecting real-world challenges. Extensive experiments across Llama, Qwen and Gemma model families show that our method enables using smaller models to efficiently align larger ones. Furthermore, we demonstrate that autoencoder mappings between base and fine-tuned models can serve as reliable "lightweight safety switches", allowing dynamic toggling between model behaviors.
Narmeen Oozeer, Dhruv Nathawani, Nirmalendu Prakash, Michael Lan, Abir Harrasse, Amir Abdullah
ICML5