Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jose-Luis Peralta-Cabezas
dblp:39/1931
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2011
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Legged, aerial and field robots · 88% Motion planning and robot control · 12% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots › bipedal robot
bipedal locomotion control |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Assessment of limit-cycle-based control on 2D kneed biped · ICRA 2011 |
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots
legged robots |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Assessment of limit-cycle-based control on 2D kneed biped · ICRA 2011 |
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots › dynamic walking
limit cycle walking |
0.0 | 1 | 2011 | Assessment of limit-cycle-based control on 2D kneed biped · ICRA 2011 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot control |
0.0 | 1 | 2011 | Assessment of limit-cycle-based control on 2D kneed biped · ICRA 2011 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
passivity-based control · 0.1computed torque control · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | Assessment of limit-cycle-based control on 2D kneed bipedabstractThis work presents an assessment of different control techniques based on Limit Cycle Walking. The study is performed on a two-dimensional kneed bipedal simulator developed with Open Dynamics Engine, which includes realistic configuration of weight allocation, link length, inertia distribution and impacts. The controllers are model-based driven from an analytic 2D kneed biped. Several controllers from the Computed Torque (CT) family together with a Passivity Based controller (PBC) are compared based on their energy efficiency and robustness. The previous controllers are used in their original form, with minor adjustment to handle hybrid systems such as the kneed biped case. PBC proved not suitable for real implementation however a combined strategy between PBC and a soft PD control has shown promising results. PD Computed Torque control also offered high tolerance to disturbances with reasonable energy consumption. Furthermore, the performance of all the controllers showed high dependency on the parameters of the robot. Jose-Luis Peralta-Cabezas, Tuomas Haarnoja, Tomi Ylikorpi, Aarne Halme |
ICRA | 1 |
| 2011 | Model-based velocity control for Limit Cycle WalkingabstractThe aim of this study is to increase the versatility of Limit Cycle Walking (LCW) robots by proposing several ideas to control their velocity. The velocity control methods presented are to be used with Computed-Torque Control (CTC). This controller utilizes a passive reference model walking down a gentle slope which provides the reference trajectory to follow. The controllers were tested on a rigid body simulator. The results show that the methods based on scaling the amplitude (step length) of the reference trajectory and changing the reference slope angle, provide an energy efficient and stable way to control the walking speed. Both of these methods also provide continuous trajectories to standing pose and running gait. Tuomas Haarnoja, Jose-Luis Peralta-Cabezas, Aarne Halme |
IROS | 2 |