Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Michael Lavine
dblp:39/2442
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2013
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 81% Computational social science and digital humanities · 19% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 100% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Data mining · 100% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › latent variable model
mixture model |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Copy or Coincidence? A Model for Detecting Social Influence and Duplication Events · ICML (3) 2013 |
Data mining
anomaly detection |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Copy or Coincidence? A Model for Detecting Social Influence and Duplication Events · ICML (3) 2013 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › population genetics
genealogical inference |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | The evolutionary forest algorithm · Bioinform. 2007 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
phylogenetics |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | The evolutionary forest algorithm · Bioinform. 2007 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
population genetics |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | The evolutionary forest algorithm · Bioinform. 2007 |
Computational social science and digital humanities
social network analysis |
0.0 | 1 | 2013 | Copy or Coincidence? A Model for Detecting Social Influence and Duplication Events · ICML (3) 2013 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
mixture model · 0.5likelihood ratio · 0.5monte carlo · 0.1evolutionary forest algorithm · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 | Copy or Coincidence? A Model for Detecting Social Influence and Duplication EventsabstractIn this paper, we analyze the task of inferring rare links between pairs of entities that seem too similar to have occurred by chance. Variations of this task appear in such diverse areas as social network analysis, security, fraud detection, and entity resolution. To address the task in a general form, we propose a simple, flexible mixture model in which most entities are generated independently from a distribution but a small number of pairs are constrained to be similar. We predict the true pairs using a likelihood ratio that trades off the entities’ similarity with their rarity. This method always outperforms using only similarity; however, with certain parameter settings, similarity turns out to be surprisingly competitive. Using real data, we apply the model to detect twins given their birth weights and to re-identify cell phone users based on distinctive usage patterns. Lisa Friedland, David D. Jensen, Michael Lavine |
ICML (3) | 3 |
| 2007 | The evolutionary forest algorithmabstractMOTIVATION: Gene genealogies offer a powerful context for inferences about the evolutionary process based on presently segregating DNA variation. In many cases, it is the distribution of population parameters, marginalized over the effectively infinite-dimensional tree space, that is of interest. Our evolutionary forest (EF) algorithm uses Monte Carlo methods to generate posterior distributions of population parameters. A novel feature is the updating of parameter values based on a probability measure defined on an ensemble of histories (a forest of genealogies), rather than a single tree. RESULTS: The EF algorithm generates samples from the correct marginal distribution of population parameters. Applied to actual data from closely related fruit fly species, it rapidly converged to posterior distributions that closely approximated the exact posteriors generated through massive computational effort. Applied to simulated data, it generated credible intervals that covered the actual parameter values in accordance with the nominal probabilities. AVAILABILITY: A C++ implementation of this method is freely accessible at http://www.isds.duke.edu/~scl13 Scotland C. Leman, Marcy K. Uyenoyama, Michael Lavine |
Bioinform. | 3 |