Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Peter Frey
dblp:39/4965
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2010
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 1 first-authorSoftware engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Performance modeling and evaluation · 87% Parallel and multicore computing · 13% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Program verification · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Program verification
theorem proving |
0.0 | 1 | 2002 | A Formal Specification and Verification Framework for Time Warp-Based Parallel Simulation · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2002 |
Performance modeling and evaluation › simulation › discrete-event simulation
parallel discrete event simulation |
0.0 | 1 | 2002 | A Formal Specification and Verification Framework for Time Warp-Based Parallel Simulation · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2002 |
Performance modeling and evaluation › simulation › discrete-event simulation › parallel discrete event simulation › optimistic simulation
time warp |
0.0 | 1 | 2002 | A Formal Specification and Verification Framework for Time Warp-Based Parallel Simulation · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2002 |
Parallel and multicore computing › synchronization
optimistic synchronization |
0.0 | 1 | 2002 | A Formal Specification and Verification Framework for Time Warp-Based Parallel Simulation · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2002 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
model checking · 0.1PVS · 0.1LTL · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 | High level synthesis of a Front End filter and DSP engine for analog to digital conversion - a case studyabstractWe present the design of a Sinc Cubed Decimator and of a Front End DSP Engine for Analog to Digital Conversion using high-level synthesis. The input language was SystemC and the High Level Synthesis tool was Cadence's C to Silicon compiler. Area and timing results, as well as comments on the overall experience, are also presented. Jose G. Mena, Richard Deken, James E. Coker, Mark S. Johnstone, Sergio R. Ramirez, Peter Frey |
VTS | 6 |
| 2002 | A Formal Specification and Verification Framework for Time Warp-Based Parallel SimulationabstractThe paper describes a formal framework developed using the Prototype Verification System (PVS) to model and verify distributed simulation kernels based on the Time Warp paradigm. The intent is to provide a common formal base from which domain specific simulators can be modeled, verified, and developed. PVS constructs are developed to represent basic Time Warp constructs. Correctness conditions for Time Warp simulation are identified, describing causal ordering of event processing and correct rollback processing. The PVS theorem prover and type-check condition system are then used to verify all correctness conditions. In addition, the paper discusses the framework's reusability and extensibility properties in support of specification and verification of Time Warp extensions and optimizations. Peter Frey, Radharamanan Radhakrishnan, Harold W. Carter, Philip A. Wilsey, Perry Alexander |
IEEE Trans. Software Eng. | 1 |
| 1997 | Parallel Synchronization of Continuous Time Discrete Event SimulatorsabstractMixed-Mode simulation has been generating considerable interest in the simulation community and has continued to grow as an active research area. Traditional mixed-mode simulation involves the merging of digital and analog simulators in various ways. However, efficient methods for the synchronization between the two time domains remains elusive. This is due to the fact that the analog simulator uses dynamic time step control whereas the digital simulator uses the event driven paradigm. This paper proposes two new synchronization methods and presents their capabilities using a component-based continuous time simulator integrated with an optimistic parallel discrete event simulator. The results of the performance evaluation leads us to believe that while both synchronization methods are functionally viable, one has superior performance. Peter Frey, Harold W. Carter, Philip A. Wilsey |
ICPP | 1 |